当前位置：文江博客知识库 en-US 文档 Web HTTP Headers Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only

Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only - HTTP 编辑

The HTTP Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only response header allows web developers to experiment with policies by monitoring (but not enforcing) their effects. These violation reports consist of JSON documents sent via an HTTP POST request to the specified URI.

For more information, see also this article on Content Security Policy (CSP).

This header is not supported inside a `<meta>` element.
Header type	Response header
Forbidden header name	no

Syntax

Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only: <policy-directive>; <policy-directive>

Directives

The directives of the Content-Security-Policy header can also be applied to Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only.

The CSP report-uri directive should be used with this header, otherwise this header will be an expensive no-op machine.

Examples

This header reports violations that would have occurred. You can use this to iteratively work on your content security policy. You observe how your site behaves, watching for violation reports, or malware redirects, then choose the desired policy enforced by the Content-Security-Policy header.

Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only: default-src https:; report-uri /csp-violation-report-endpoint/

If you still want to receive reporting, but also want to enforce a policy, use the Content-Security-Policy header with the report-uri directive.

Content-Security-Policy: default-src https:; report-uri /csp-violation-report-endpoint/

Violation report syntax

The report JSON object contains the following data:

blocked-uri: The URI of the resource that was blocked from loading by the Content Security Policy. If the blocked URI is from a different origin than the document-uri, then the blocked URI is truncated to contain just the scheme, host, and port.
disposition: Either "enforce" or "report" depending on whether the Content-Security-Policy header or the Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only header is used.
document-uri: The URI of the document in which the violation occurred.
effective-directive: The directive whose enforcement caused the violation.
original-policy: The original policy as specified by the Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only HTTP header.
referrer: The referrer of the document in which the violation occurred.
script-sample: The first 40 characters of the inline script, event handler, or style that caused the violation.
status-code: The HTTP status code of the resource on which the global object was instantiated.
violated-directive: The name of the policy section that was violated.

Sample violation report

Let's consider a page located at http://example.com/signup.html. It uses the following policy, disallowing everything but stylesheets from cdn.example.com.

Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only: default-src 'none'; style-src cdn.example.com; report-uri /_/csp-reports

The HTML of signup.html looks like this:

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <title>Sign Up</title>
    <link rel="stylesheet" href="css/style.css">
  </head>
  <body>
    ... Content ...
  </body>
</html>

Can you spot the violation? Stylesheets are only allowed to be loaded from cdn.example.com, yet the website tries to load one from its own origin (http://example.com). A browser capable of enforcing CSP will send the following violation report as a POST request to http://example.com/_/csp-reports, when the document is visited:

{
  "csp-report": {
    "document-uri": "http://example.com/signup.html",
    "referrer": "",
    "blocked-uri": "http://example.com/css/style.css",
    "violated-directive": "style-src cdn.example.com",
    "original-policy": "default-src 'none'; style-src cdn.example.com; report-uri /_/csp-reports",
    "disposition": "report"
  }
}

As you can see, the report includes the full path to the violating resource in blocked-uri. This is not always the case. For example, when the signup.html would attempt to load CSS from http://anothercdn.example.com/stylesheet.css, the browser would not include the full path but only the origin (http://anothercdn.example.com). This is done to prevent leaking sensitive information about cross-origin resources.

Specifications

Specification	Status	Comment
Content Security Policy Level 3	Working Draft	No changes.
Content Security Policy Level 2	Recommendation	Initial definition.

Browser compatibility

BCD tables only load in the browser

Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only - HTTP 编辑

Syntax

Directives

Examples

Violation report syntax

Sample violation report

Specifications

Browser compatibility

See also

如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

发布评论

词条统计

友情链接

Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only - HTTP 编辑

如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

发布评论

词条统计

友情链接

如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。