不要您需要集中数据库来验证NFT的身份
因此，我有一段时间有这个问题，尽管这似乎是一个非常基本的问题，但我还没有找到答案。抱歉，如果它已经在某个地方回答，我错过了。
因此，可以说，大艺术家爱丽丝（Alice Mint）的艺术含量很大。让我们称之为nft A.此NFT由一个令牌标识，我们可以验证谁是所有者，因此也可以使它铸造出来。
但这是捕获。让我们骗取同一件艺术品的骗子鲍勃·蒙特斯（Bob Mints Nft）B。现在，当您进入市场时，有两个NFT似乎是同一艺术品。因此，您现在需要找到哪个是“真实的”。为此，您需要查看谁铸造了它，并验证它是真正的艺术家。
但是，您如何以偏心的方式做到这一点？感觉我需要确认地址属于爱丽丝，但是如何获得/确认此信息？
在Big Nft的情况下，就像加密邮票一样，这很容易，因为每个人都知道这是正确的铸造地址，但据我所知，对于较小的艺术家来说，这实际上是不可能说的。这就是（我认为）通过铸造它的nft来“偷”艺术品很容易的原因之一。
我猜这个问题一定会一次又一次地考虑到，但是我无法找到有关它的讨论。
So I have had this question for a while, and I haven't been able to find an answer yet, although it seems like a very basic question. Apologies if it is already answered somewhere and I missed it.
So lets say big artist Alice mints an NFT of her art. Lets call this NFT A. This NFT is identified by a token, and we can verify who is the owner, and thus also which adress minted it.
But here is the catch. Let's scam artist Bob mints NFT B of the same art piece. Now when you go on a marketplace there are two NFT's of seemingly the same art piece. So you need now to find which one is the 'real one'. To do that, you need to look at who minted it, and verify that it is the real artist.
But how do you do that in a de-centralized manner ? It feels like I would need to confirm that an address belongs to Alice, but how can I get/confirm this information ?
In the case of big NFT's like the cryptopunks it is easy because everyone 'knows' which is the correct minting address, but for smaller artists it is literally impossible to tell, as far as I know. And this is (I think) one of the reasons that it is easy to 'steal' art piece by minting an NFT of it.
I guess this concern must have been considered time and time again, but I have not been able to find discussion about it.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论