argon2比咸的哈希算法好吗？
我已经知道，缓慢敲打功能非常适合存储密码，因为破解它们非常耗时。而且我们知道Argon2是一种缓慢的算法，不仅如此，而且Argon2也消耗了很多记忆。网站管理员只需要在登录尝试或创建密码时就需要一次资源，因为攻击者/黑客每次尝试都需要此类资源。这使Argon2比安全的哈希算法好一些。
但是我想深入了解我最初的问题，即argon2比咸的哈希算法更好吗？
I already know that slow-hashing functions are good for storing passwords as it is very time consuming to crack them. And we know that Argon2 is a slow algorithm, and not only that, but Argon2 consumes a lot of memory as well. A webmaster would just require the resources only once upon login attempt or password creation, where as the attacker/hacker will require such resources per each and every single try. This makes Argon2 somewhat better than secure hashing algorithms.
But I want deep insights into my original question that, is Argon2 better than salted hashing algorithm?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（1）
Argon2是一种咸的哈希算法。
Argon2 is a salted hashing algorithm.