多个ChangeNotifierProxyProviders将更新馈送到ChangeNotifier

发布于 2025-02-04 05:58:35 字数 761 浏览 4 评论 0原文

我有三个changeNotifierProvider提供商,让我们称它们为abc

我需要的是提供商的更改ab以更新提供商c,但是下面的代码不起作用。

MultiProvider(
  providers: [
    ChangeNotifierProvider(create: (context) => A()),
    ChangeNotifierProvider(create: (context) => B()),
    ChangeNotifierProxyProvider<A, C>(
      create: (context) => C(),
      update: (_, a, c) => c!..updateFromA(a),
    ),
    ChangeNotifierProxyProvider<B, C>(
      create: (context) => C(),
      update: (_, b, c) => c!..updateFromB(b),
    ),
  ]

我认为它不起作用的原因是因为我最终获得了多个提供商c的副本,但是我不确定如何修复它或更好的替代实现是什么样的。

I have three ChangeNotifierProvider providers, let's call them A, B and C.

What I need is for changes in providers A and B to update provider C, but the code below isn't working.

MultiProvider(
  providers: [
    ChangeNotifierProvider(create: (context) => A()),
    ChangeNotifierProvider(create: (context) => B()),
    ChangeNotifierProxyProvider<A, C>(
      create: (context) => C(),
      update: (_, a, c) => c!..updateFromA(a),
    ),
    ChangeNotifierProxyProvider<B, C>(
      create: (context) => C(),
      update: (_, b, c) => c!..updateFromB(b),
    ),
  ]

I think the reason why it doesn't work is because I end up with multiple copies of provider C, but I am not sure how to fix it or what a better alternative implementation would look like.

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(2

倾城花音 2025-02-11 05:58:35

进行了一些搜索之后,我意识到Flutter提供了一种使用changeNotifierProxyProvider2来解决此问题的优雅开箱即用的方式。

MultiProvider(
  providers: [
    ChangeNotifierProvider(create: (context) => A()),
    ChangeNotifierProvider(create: (context) => B()),
    ChangeNotifierProxyProvider2<A, B, C>(
      create: (context) => C(),
      update: (_, a, b, c) => c!..updateFromA(a)..updateFromB(b),
    ),
  ]

Flutter还提供ChangeNotifierProxyProvider3通过changeNotifierProxyProvider6,但这当然会变得非常冗长且令人困惑。

After doing some searching, I realized that Flutter provides an elegant out-of-the-box way of solving this problem using ChangeNotifierProxyProvider2.

MultiProvider(
  providers: [
    ChangeNotifierProvider(create: (context) => A()),
    ChangeNotifierProvider(create: (context) => B()),
    ChangeNotifierProxyProvider2<A, B, C>(
      create: (context) => C(),
      update: (_, a, b, c) => c!..updateFromA(a)..updateFromB(b),
    ),
  ]

Flutter also provides ChangeNotifierProxyProvider3 through ChangeNotifierProxyProvider6, but that would, of course, get very verbose and confusing.

注定孤独终老 2025-02-11 05:58:35

如果问题是一个以上的实例,那么我认为您可以使用提供者。

MultiProvider(
  providers: [
    ChangeNotifierProvider(create: (context) => A()),
    ChangeNotifierProvider(create: (context) => B()),
    ChangeNotifierProvider(create: (context) => C()),
    ChangeNotifierProxyProvider<A, C>(
      create: (context) => Provider.of<C>(context),
      update: (_, a, c) => c!..updateFromA(a),
    ),
    ChangeNotifierProxyProvider<B, C>(
      create: (context) => Provider.of<C>(context),
      update: (_, b, c) => c!..updateFromB(b),
    ),
  ]

否则,您可以将Singleton模式应用于C:

class C {
  static final C _instance = C._();

  factory C() {
    return _instance;
  }

  C._();
}
MultiProvider(
  providers: [
    ChangeNotifierProvider(create: (context) => A()),
    ChangeNotifierProvider(create: (context) => B()),
    ChangeNotifierProxyProvider<A, C>(
      create: (context) => C(),
      update: (_, a, c) => c!..updateFromA(a),
    ),
    ChangeNotifierProxyProvider<B, C>(
      create: (context) => C(),
      update: (_, b, c) => c!..updateFromB(b),
    ),
  ]

If having more than one instance of C is the problem, then I think you can just use Provider.of<C>(context) to get a single instance.

MultiProvider(
  providers: [
    ChangeNotifierProvider(create: (context) => A()),
    ChangeNotifierProvider(create: (context) => B()),
    ChangeNotifierProvider(create: (context) => C()),
    ChangeNotifierProxyProvider<A, C>(
      create: (context) => Provider.of<C>(context),
      update: (_, a, c) => c!..updateFromA(a),
    ),
    ChangeNotifierProxyProvider<B, C>(
      create: (context) => Provider.of<C>(context),
      update: (_, b, c) => c!..updateFromB(b),
    ),
  ]

Or else, you could apply the singleton pattern to C:

class C {
  static final C _instance = C._();

  factory C() {
    return _instance;
  }

  C._();
}
MultiProvider(
  providers: [
    ChangeNotifierProvider(create: (context) => A()),
    ChangeNotifierProvider(create: (context) => B()),
    ChangeNotifierProxyProvider<A, C>(
      create: (context) => C(),
      update: (_, a, c) => c!..updateFromA(a),
    ),
    ChangeNotifierProxyProvider<B, C>(
      create: (context) => C(),
      update: (_, b, c) => c!..updateFromB(b),
    ),
  ]
~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文