默认随机引擎作为类成员,即使通过参考文献未更新外部引擎

发布于 2025-02-03 19:50:22 字数 939 浏览 2 评论 0原文

我知道我必须通过引用传递随机引擎,以使其从功能中更新。但是,如果我在课堂构造中通过引用将其传递,则看起来种子在班级外面没有变化。

最低限度的工作示例:

#include<iostream>
#include<random>

class rv{
        public: 
        std::default_random_engine rv_eng;
        rv(std::default_random_engine & eng){
                this->rv_eng = eng;
        }
        double nd(){
                std::normal_distribution<double> ndist {0.0, 1.0};
                double draw = ndist(this->rv_eng);
                return draw;
        }
};

int main(){
        std::default_random_engine main_engine;
        main_engine.seed(123);
        std::cout << main_engine << std::endl;
        rv rv_instance(main_engine);
        std::cout << rv_instance.nd() << std::endl;
        std::cout << main_engine << std::endl;
        return 0;
}

我得到的结果是

123
-0.331232
123

,我希望第二个发电机会更改。为什么一样?

I know that I have to pass the random engine by reference in order for it to update out of a function. However, if I pass it by reference in a class construction, it looks like the seed is not changing outside of the class.

Minimum working example:

#include<iostream>
#include<random>

class rv{
        public: 
        std::default_random_engine rv_eng;
        rv(std::default_random_engine & eng){
                this->rv_eng = eng;
        }
        double nd(){
                std::normal_distribution<double> ndist {0.0, 1.0};
                double draw = ndist(this->rv_eng);
                return draw;
        }
};

int main(){
        std::default_random_engine main_engine;
        main_engine.seed(123);
        std::cout << main_engine << std::endl;
        rv rv_instance(main_engine);
        std::cout << rv_instance.nd() << std::endl;
        std::cout << main_engine << std::endl;
        return 0;
}

The result I get is

123
-0.331232
123

While I would have expected the second generator to change. Why is it the same?

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(1

归途 2025-02-10 19:50:22

就像其他已经建议的人一样;使用初始化列表,这样您就可以将参考变量作为成员:

class rv
{
public:
    std::default_random_engine& eng_ref;
    rv(std::default_random_engine& eng) : eng_ref{ eng } {};
    double nd()
    {
        std::normal_distribution<double> ndist {0.0, 1.0};
        double draw = ndist(eng_ref);
        return draw;
    }
};

Like someone else already suggested; use an initializer list, that way you can have a reference variable as a member:

class rv
{
public:
    std::default_random_engine& eng_ref;
    rv(std::default_random_engine& eng) : eng_ref{ eng } {};
    double nd()
    {
        std::normal_distribution<double> ndist {0.0, 1.0};
        double draw = ndist(eng_ref);
        return draw;
    }
};
~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文