如何在节点JS中编写此Java加密函数的等效词
这是用于在Java中加密的功能,
public static String encryptionFunction(String fieldValue, String pemFileLocation) {
try {
// Read key from file
String strKeyPEM = "";
BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(pemFileLocation));
String line;
while ((line = br.readLine()) != null) {
strKeyPEM += line + "\n";
}
br.close();
String publicKeyPEM = strKeyPEM;
System.out.println(publicKeyPEM);
publicKeyPEM = publicKeyPEM.replace("-----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY-----\n", "");
publicKeyPEM = publicKeyPEM.replace("-----END PUBLIC KEY-----", "").replaceAll("\\s", "");;
byte[] encoded = Base64.getDecoder().decode(publicKeyPEM);
// byte[] encoded = Base64.decode(publicKeyPEM);
KeyFactory kf = KeyFactory.getInstance("RSA");
PublicKey pubKey = (PublicKey) kf.generatePublic(new X509EncodedKeySpec(encoded));
Cipher cipher = Cipher.getInstance("RSA/ECB/PKCS1Padding");
cipher.init(Cipher.ENCRYPT_MODE, pubKey);
byte[] cipherData = cipher.doFinal(fieldValue.getBytes());
if (cipherData == null) {
return null;
}
int len = cipherData.length;
String str = "";
for (int i = 0; i < len; i++) {
if ((cipherData[i] & 0xFF) < 16) {
str = str + "0" + java.lang.Integer.toHexString(cipherData[i] & 0xFF);
} else {
str = str + java.lang.Integer.toHexString(cipherData[i] & 0xFF);
}
}
return str.trim();
} catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println("oops2");
System.out.println(e);
}
return null;
}
我希望在JavaScript/nodejs中等效地等效,我尝试过:
import * as NodeRSA from 'node-rsa';
private encryptionFunction(fieldValue: string , pemkey: string) : string {
const rsa = new NodeRSA(pemkey);
const encrypted= rsa.encrypt(fieldValue , 'hex')
return encrypted
}
但是两个函数的输出大小都是相同的,但显然加密类型是错误的。
This is the function used to encrypt in java
public static String encryptionFunction(String fieldValue, String pemFileLocation) {
try {
// Read key from file
String strKeyPEM = "";
BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(pemFileLocation));
String line;
while ((line = br.readLine()) != null) {
strKeyPEM += line + "\n";
}
br.close();
String publicKeyPEM = strKeyPEM;
System.out.println(publicKeyPEM);
publicKeyPEM = publicKeyPEM.replace("-----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY-----\n", "");
publicKeyPEM = publicKeyPEM.replace("-----END PUBLIC KEY-----", "").replaceAll("\\s", "");;
byte[] encoded = Base64.getDecoder().decode(publicKeyPEM);
// byte[] encoded = Base64.decode(publicKeyPEM);
KeyFactory kf = KeyFactory.getInstance("RSA");
PublicKey pubKey = (PublicKey) kf.generatePublic(new X509EncodedKeySpec(encoded));
Cipher cipher = Cipher.getInstance("RSA/ECB/PKCS1Padding");
cipher.init(Cipher.ENCRYPT_MODE, pubKey);
byte[] cipherData = cipher.doFinal(fieldValue.getBytes());
if (cipherData == null) {
return null;
}
int len = cipherData.length;
String str = "";
for (int i = 0; i < len; i++) {
if ((cipherData[i] & 0xFF) < 16) {
str = str + "0" + java.lang.Integer.toHexString(cipherData[i] & 0xFF);
} else {
str = str + java.lang.Integer.toHexString(cipherData[i] & 0xFF);
}
}
return str.trim();
} catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println("oops2");
System.out.println(e);
}
return null;
}
I want the equivalent of this in javascript/Nodejs, i tried this:
import * as NodeRSA from 'node-rsa';
private encryptionFunction(fieldValue: string , pemkey: string) : string {
const rsa = new NodeRSA(pemkey);
const encrypted= rsa.encrypt(fieldValue , 'hex')
return encrypted
}
But the output size of both functions is the same, but apparently the encryption type is wrong.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5906/d59060df4059a6cc364216c4d63ceec29ef7fe66" alt="扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群"
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(1)
node-rsa应用OAEP(在这里)默认为padding #1 V1.5必须明确指定Java代码中使用的填充物。必须在密钥导入和加密之前添加:
或者,可以在关键导入期间直接指定填充物:
通过此更改,两个代码在功能上都是相同的。
关于测试:请记住,RSA加密不是确定性的,IE给定相同的输入(键,明文),每个加密提供了不同的ciphertext 。因此,即使输入是相同的,两种(功能相同)代码的密文也将有所不同。因此,这不是一个错误,而是预期的行为。
那么如何证明这两个代码的等效性呢?例如,使用相同代码/工具将两个密文解密。
Node-RSA applies OAEP (here) as padding by default, so the PKCS#1 v1.5 padding used in the Java code must be explicitly specified. This has to be added after key import and before encryption:
Alternatively, the padding can be specified directly during key import:
With this change, both codes are functionally identical.
Regarding testing: Keep in mind that RSA encryption is not deterministic, i.e. given the same input (key, plaintext), each encryption provides a different ciphertext. Therefore, the ciphertexts of both (functionally identical) codes will be different even if the input is identical. So this is not a bug, but the expected behavior.
How then can the equivalence of both codes be proved? E.g. by decrypting both ciphertexts with the same code/tool.