执行任何（最好是开源的）单范围 unicode fonts 包括IBM私人使用区域（PUA） ）字符 ebcdic代码页面310 ？
例如： u+f892 ; EBCDIC代码第310页字节值x'81'，gcgid sf630000，“双垂直，条形图”。 （查找行F89_，列_2的SF630000表单元格。）
我正在寻找一个字体，其中包含所有可以在IBM 3270终端上显示的字符。
我目前正在使用Noto Sans Mono在HTML中呈现IBM 3270终端屏幕捕获。 Noto Sans Mono对3270屏幕可以显示的APL字符有很好的报道，但缺乏3270特异性的IBM PUA字符。例如，noto sans mono包括标准的u+2551（盒子图双垂直），线条结合在一起，但（可以理解的）不是IBM PUA U+F892，在该线路尽可能远。字形显着不同。
我不一定要索要一个单字体，其中包含noto sans mono和ibm pua字符中的每个角色。包含那些IBM PUA字符的字体，具有与Noto Sans Mono相同的字体指标，我可以通过CSS指定为“ Fall back”，对我来说对我有用（如果不是全部）用例。
对于，我正在使用IBM PLEX单字体。 ibm plex缺少3270终端可以显示的某些字符，但是对于许多屏幕，对于许多屏幕来说，没关系。
有关此问题的背景，请参见“ “ Wikipedia文章的“ APL符号的数字编码”。
Do any (preferably, open-source) monospace Unicode fonts include the IBM Private Use Area (PUA) characters for EBCDIC code page 310?
For example: U+F892; EBCDIC code page 310 byte value X'81', GCGID SF630000, "Double Vertical, Bar Graphic". (Look for the SF630000 table cell in row F89_, column _2.)
I'm looking for a font that includes all of the characters that can be displayed on an IBM 3270 terminal.
I'm currently using Noto Sans Mono to present IBM 3270 terminal screen captures in HTML. Noto Sans Mono has good coverage of the APL characters that 3270 screens can display, but lacks the 3270-specific IBM PUA characters. For example, Noto Sans Mono includes the standard U+2551 (BOX DRAWINGS DOUBLE VERTICAL), with the lines close together, but (understandably) not the IBM PUA U+F892, where the lines are as far apart as possible. The glyphs are significantly different.
I'm not necessarily asking for a single font that contains, say, every character in Noto Sans Mono plus the IBM PUA characters. A font that includes those IBM PUA characters, that has the same font metrics as Noto Sans Mono, that I can specify via CSS as a "fall back", would work for me for most (if not all) use cases.
For IBM 3270 screen captures in IBM documentation, I'm using the IBM Plex Mono font. IBM Plex lacks some of the characters that 3270 terminals can display, but for many screens, that doesn't matter.
For background to this question, see the Talk page section "Incorrect mapping of EBCDIC code page 310 (APL) to Unicode characters?" of the Wikipedia article "Digital encoding of APL symbols".
发布评论