mysql死锁根本原因 - 冬眠
我有一个冬眠的代码片段,如下所示。
此方法是一种常见的方法,当我使用两个不同的锁(在平行流中)时,我最终会有死锁方案。我试图了解死锁的根本原因。
[Spring/JPA/Hibernate/MySQL]
@Transactional(isolation = Isolation.SERIALIZABLE)
public void someMethod(String lockName) { // Lock name can be of two types
jpaRepository.lock(lockName, TIMEOUT_10_SECONDS);
List<Object> values = jpaRepository.findByDate();
Integer sequence = jpaRepository.getNextSequenceValue(); // Fetches next value from sequence generator
//...... set sequence numbers to object
jpaRepository.updateSequence(); // A named query here to update sequence with latest value
jpaRepository.saveAll(); // JPA's persist call
}
InnoDB状态
------------------------
LATEST DETECTED DEADLOCK
------------------------
2022-03-24 00:05:03 0x16c113000
*** (1) TRANSACTION:
TRANSACTION 2000, ACTIVE 0 sec inserting
mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
LOCK WAIT 6 lock struct(s), heap size 1128, 3 row lock(s), undo log entries 2
MySQL thread id 54, OS thread handle 6131019776, query id 976 localhost 127.0.0.1 root update
/* mysql-connector-java-8.0.27 (Revision: e920b979015ae7117d60d72bcc8f077a839cd791 */ insert into SequenceId (invoice_id, post_processed_sequence_value, sequence_id, sequence_value) values (1648076703544, '79', '2000', 79)
*** (1) HOLDS THE LOCK(S):
RECORD LOCKS space id 3 page no 6 n bits 192 index invoice_id of table `sequenceid` trx id 2000 lock mode S
Record lock, heap no 1 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 1; compact format; info bits 0
0: len 8; hex 73757072656d756d; asc supremum;;
*** (1) WAITING FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:
RECORD LOCKS space id 3 page no 6 n bits 192 index invoice_id of table `sequenceid` trx id 2000 lock_mode X insert intention waiting
Record lock, heap no 1 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 1; compact format; info bits 0
0: len 8; hex 73757072656d756d; asc supremum;;
*** (2) TRANSACTION:
TRANSACTION 1999, ACTIVE 0 sec inserting
mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
LOCK WAIT 6 lock struct(s), heap size 1128, 3 row lock(s), undo log entries 2
MySQL thread id 53, OS thread handle 6132133888, query id 977 localhost 127.0.0.1 root update
/* mysql-connector-java-8.0.27 (Revision: e920b979015ae7117d60d72bcc8f077a839cd791) */ insert into SequenceId (ref_id, post_processed_sequence_value, sequence_id, sequence_value) values (1648076703512, '50046', '1000', 50046)
*** (2) HOLDS THE LOCK(S):
RECORD LOCKS space id 3 page no 6 n bits 192 index invoice_id of table `sequenceid` trx id 1999 lock mode S
Record lock, heap no 1 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 1; compact format; info bits 0
0: len 8; hex 73757072656d756d; asc supremum;;
*** (2) WAITING FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:
RECORD LOCKS space id 3 page no 6 n bits 192 index invoice_id of table `sequenceid` trx id 1999 lock_mode X insert intention waiting
Record lock, heap no 1 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 1; compact format; info bits 0
0: len 8; hex 73757072656d756d; asc supremum;;
*** WE ROLL BACK TRANSACTION (2)
I have a code snippet in hibernate, structured like below.
This method is a common method and when I use two different locks (In parallel stream) I end up having dead lock scenario. I am trying to understand the root cause of the dead lock.
[Spring/JPA/Hibernate/MySql]
@Transactional(isolation = Isolation.SERIALIZABLE)
public void someMethod(String lockName) { // Lock name can be of two types
jpaRepository.lock(lockName, TIMEOUT_10_SECONDS);
List<Object> values = jpaRepository.findByDate();
Integer sequence = jpaRepository.getNextSequenceValue(); // Fetches next value from sequence generator
//...... set sequence numbers to object
jpaRepository.updateSequence(); // A named query here to update sequence with latest value
jpaRepository.saveAll(); // JPA's persist call
}
Innodb status
------------------------
LATEST DETECTED DEADLOCK
------------------------
2022-03-24 00:05:03 0x16c113000
*** (1) TRANSACTION:
TRANSACTION 2000, ACTIVE 0 sec inserting
mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
LOCK WAIT 6 lock struct(s), heap size 1128, 3 row lock(s), undo log entries 2
MySQL thread id 54, OS thread handle 6131019776, query id 976 localhost 127.0.0.1 root update
/* mysql-connector-java-8.0.27 (Revision: e920b979015ae7117d60d72bcc8f077a839cd791 */ insert into SequenceId (invoice_id, post_processed_sequence_value, sequence_id, sequence_value) values (1648076703544, '79', '2000', 79)
*** (1) HOLDS THE LOCK(S):
RECORD LOCKS space id 3 page no 6 n bits 192 index invoice_id of table `sequenceid` trx id 2000 lock mode S
Record lock, heap no 1 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 1; compact format; info bits 0
0: len 8; hex 73757072656d756d; asc supremum;;
*** (1) WAITING FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:
RECORD LOCKS space id 3 page no 6 n bits 192 index invoice_id of table `sequenceid` trx id 2000 lock_mode X insert intention waiting
Record lock, heap no 1 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 1; compact format; info bits 0
0: len 8; hex 73757072656d756d; asc supremum;;
*** (2) TRANSACTION:
TRANSACTION 1999, ACTIVE 0 sec inserting
mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
LOCK WAIT 6 lock struct(s), heap size 1128, 3 row lock(s), undo log entries 2
MySQL thread id 53, OS thread handle 6132133888, query id 977 localhost 127.0.0.1 root update
/* mysql-connector-java-8.0.27 (Revision: e920b979015ae7117d60d72bcc8f077a839cd791) */ insert into SequenceId (ref_id, post_processed_sequence_value, sequence_id, sequence_value) values (1648076703512, '50046', '1000', 50046)
*** (2) HOLDS THE LOCK(S):
RECORD LOCKS space id 3 page no 6 n bits 192 index invoice_id of table `sequenceid` trx id 1999 lock mode S
Record lock, heap no 1 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 1; compact format; info bits 0
0: len 8; hex 73757072656d756d; asc supremum;;
*** (2) WAITING FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:
RECORD LOCKS space id 3 page no 6 n bits 192 index invoice_id of table `sequenceid` trx id 1999 lock_mode X insert intention waiting
Record lock, heap no 1 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 1; compact format; info bits 0
0: len 8; hex 73757072656d756d; asc supremum;;
*** WE ROLL BACK TRANSACTION (2)
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(1)
当在可序列化的隔离中执行交易时,读取语句获取共享锁。
请找到下面的详细信息
现在,线程1和螺纹2正在争夺相同的锁,并导致僵局。
When a transaction is executed in serializable isolation read statements acquire shared lock.
Please find the details below
Now Thread 1 and Thread 2 are competing for the same lock and it causes deadlock.