有没有更简单的方法来编写它而不将其放入函数中？
我几乎每一行都这样做：
if printAll then print("message for debugging") end
有没有一种方法可以语法糖这个，而不将其放入函数中？
local function cPrint(text) --conditional printing
if printAll then
print(text)
end
end
cPrint("message for debugging")
因为该函数必须不断地传递一个变量，然后才发现它是不需要的。由于 printAll 通常为 false，这种资源滥用不是我想要的。这个函数可能每分钟运行数百万次，传递一个仅使用内存而被丢弃的参数感觉很糟糕。
那么有没有一种方法可以在传递参数之前放弃这个条件，这样看起来更好一点呢？ （主要原因是，读取以“if”开头的嵌套 if-else 结构会更加混乱。）
I do this nearly every line:
if printAll then print("message for debugging") end
Is there a way to syntax sugar this, without putting it in a function?
local function cPrint(text) --conditional printing
if printAll then
print(text)
end
end
cPrint("message for debugging")
Because that function would have to constantly pass a variable only to find out that it isn't needed. Since printAll is usually false, this kind of misuse of resources is not what I want. This function might get run millions of times per minute, it just feels bad to pass an argument that uses memory only to be discarded.
So is there a way to discard this condition before an argument is passed that's a little nicer to look at? (The main reason being that it's more confusing to read nested if-else structures with those lines in there that start with "if".)
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（1）
这对你有用吗？
它节省了执行
if，但不节省函数调用。这是一个替代方案，它执行隐藏的
if，但避免了函数调用：它实际上并不比
Does this work for you?
It saves executing the
if, but not the function call.Here is an alternative, that executes a hidden
if, but avoids the function call:It's not really any more readable than