LVL 拒绝颁发有效许可证是否正常？
我偶尔会收到用户的投诉，称我的付费应用程序未通过 Android 市场许可证验证库检查。我无法发布代码示例，但我的代码与 LVL 文档中的示例非常相似，有一点自定义混淆，而且它适用于 99% 的用户。我检查了抱怨的用户确实购买了我的应用程序。
我正在认真考虑完全放弃 LVL，因为无论如何我的应用程序一天之内就被黑了，而 LVL 看起来就像一个笑话。是否已知它会定期失败，或者问题肯定出在我的应用程序中？
抱歉，我无法提供更多信息，但我会尽力回答任何问题。
I am getting occasional complaints from my users that my paid application is failing the Android Market Licence Verification Library check. I cannot post code samples but my code is very similar to the sample in the LVL doc, with a little custom obfuscation, plus it works for 99% of my users. And I checked that the complaining users did indeed buy my app.
I'm seriously thinking of dropping the LVL altogether because my app was hacked in a day anyway and the LVL seems like a joke. Is it known to fail periodically or is the problem definitely in my app?
Sorry I cannot provide more info but I'll try to answer any questions I can.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（1）
我们和许多其他人一样，已经遭受同样的问题一段时间了。这似乎是谷歌意识到的一个问题（ https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/bin/static.py?hl=en&page=known_issues.cs ）但没有解决方案，或任何真正的信息然而。
我们发出以下内容，帮助一些用户解决了问题：
我怀疑有一种方法可以使用 LVL 并且它可以按预期工作，但目前看来 1% 的用户会被卡住。
We have been suffering from the same problem for a while now as have many others. It seems to be a problem that google is aware of ( https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/bin/static.py?hl=en&page=known_issues.cs ) but no solution, or any information really as yet.
We send out the following which has helped a few users to clear the problem:
I suspect there is a way to use LVL and it work as expected but for now it seems like 1% of users will be stuck.