HTML 5 Web 数据库发生了什么?

发布于 2025-01-03 01:43:53 字数 297 浏览 1 评论 0原文

我查看了该网站 http://www.w3.org/TR/webdatabase/我在那里看到了一个巨大的横幅,上面写着

“当心。该规范不再处于主动维护状态,并且 Web 应用程序工作组不打算进一步维护它。”

那是什么意思?我正在考虑使用这个功能来实现一些东西。但如果它不会被标准化(最终),我不想在其中实现一些东西。

你建议我继续努力吗?如果没有,是否有标准化的替代方案?或者这只是另一个已被废弃的规范?

I checked out the site at http://www.w3.org/TR/webdatabase/ and I saw a huge banner there that said

"Beware. This specification is no longer in active maintenance and the Web Applications Working Group does not intend to maintain it further."

What's that supposed to mean? I was thinking of implementing something using this feature. But I don't want to implement something in it if its not going to be standardized(eventually).

Do you suggest that I go ahead working on it? If not, is there an alternative that would be standardized? Or is it just another spec that has been scrapped?

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(2

浮世清欢 2025-01-10 01:43:53

其含义正如其所言:W3C 已放弃该标准,并且不打算对其进行任何进一步的工作。

您正在寻找 IndexedDB,它正在积极开发中。

It means exactly what it says: the W3C has dropped the standard and isn't planning to do any further work on it.

You're looking for IndexedDB, which is under active development.

梓梦 2025-01-10 01:43:53

从文件中的三段开始:

该文档位于 W3C 推荐轨道上,但规范工作已停止。该规范陷入了僵局:所有感兴趣的实现者都使用相同的 SQL 后端 (Sqlite),但我们需要多个独立的实现来沿着标准化路径前进。


如果没有,是否有标准化的替代方案?

网络存储

From three paragraphs further on in the document:

This document was on the W3C Recommendation track but specification work has stopped. The specification reached an impasse: all interested implementors have used the same SQL backend (Sqlite), but we need multiple independent implementations to proceed along a standardisation path.


If not, is there an alternative that would be standardized?

Web Storage

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文