Active Record 3.0 和 Castle.Core 3.0
有谁知道何时会有一个链接到 Castle.Core 3.0 的 Castle Active Record 官方版本？在当前的官方版本中，不可能同时使用 Active Record 和 Windsor - 第一个寻找 Castle.Core 的 2.5.1，第二个寻找 3.0。
有人用这样的组合吗？
基本上：Active Record 还活着吗？我们是否应该期待任何事情很快就会发生，或者这个项目是否会被放弃？
Does anyone knows when there will be an official build for Castle Active Record that would link to Castle.Core 3.0? With current official builds it's not possible to use both Active Record and Windsor - the first looking for 2.5.1 of the Castle.Core and the second for 3.0.
Does anyone use such combo?
Basically: Is Active Record alive? Should we expect anything to come any time soon or is this project abandoned?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（1）
我希望这不会显得粗鲁，但这里似乎对开源的工作原理存在误解。对于大多数开源项目，您不会“期望很快就会发生任何事情”。这样做基本上意味着期望其他人免费为你工作。一个项目并未死亡，因为它尚未将某些依赖项更新到最新版本（大约 1.5 个月前发布）。如果是这样的话，大多数项目都会死掉！ :)
衡量项目活力的一些相关指标包括（包含 ActiveRecord 的链接）：
正如您所看到的，ActiveRecord 的使用可能正在下降，但它根本没有消失。
因此，引用 Castle 网站：“我们以社区参与为动力，欢迎您来帮忙。”
我鼓励您分叉存储库并尝试更新 Core。如果您遇到任何不明白的重大更改，您可以随时依赖 Castle 开发人员列表。
I hope this doesn't come out as rude, but there seems to be a misunderstanding here about how open source works. With most open source projects, you don't get to "expect anything to come any time soon". Doing so basically means expecting other people to work for you for free. A project is not dead because it hasn't yet updated some dependency to its latest version (which was released about 1.5 months ago). If that were the case, most projects would be dead! :)
Some relevant metrics to measure project liveliness include (with links to ActiveRecord):
As you can see, ActiveRecord use may be in decline but it's not dead at all.
So, to quote the Castle website: "We are driven by community involvement and welcome you to help out."
I encourage you to fork the repository and try to update Core. If you run into any breaking changes you don't understand you can always rely on the Castle dev list.