ApacheActiveMQ 和 ApacheActiveMQApollo 之间的区别
Apache ActiveMQ 和 Apache ActiveMQ Apollo 之间有什么区别？
Apollo 文档中说：“ActiveMQ Apollo 是一个更快、更可靠、更易于维护的消息代理，它是在原始 ActiveMQ 的基础上构建的。它使用完全不同的线程和消息调度架构来实现这一点。”，但没有 java 示例代码和良好的用户指南。
有人在现场环境中使用 ApacheActiveMQApollo 吗？比原来的ActiveMQ性能更好吗？
What's the difference between Apache ActiveMQ and Apache ActiveMQ Apollo?
Apollo documents says:"ActiveMQ Apollo is a faster, more reliable, easier to maintain messaging broker built from the foundations of the original ActiveMQ. It accomplishes this using a radically different threading and message dispatching architecture.", but there isn't java sample code and good user guide.
Does Anyone use ApacheActiveMQApollo in live environment? Do better performance to original ActiveMQ?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（1）
ActiveMQ v5是目前稳定的ActiveMQ产品。它经过了很好的强化，并具有多年来添加的许多功能，它有文档记录并得到良好的支持。 ActiveMQ Apollo 是下一代 ActiveMQ，它使用完全不同的架构从头开始重写。目前它的功能还不如 ActiveMQ 丰富，但每个版本都会变得更好。目前 Apollo 的用户数量或支持还远远不够，因此在选择它作为消息传递提供商之前，您应该仔细评估它以确保它满足您的需求。
ActiveMQ v5 is the current stable ActiveMQ product. It's well hardened and has a number of features that have been added over the years, it's documented and well supported. ActiveMQ Apollo is the next generation of ActiveMQ, it's rewritten from scratch using a radically different architecture. Currently it's not nearly as feature rich as ActiveMQ but it gets better with each release. There's not nearly the amount of users or support for Apollo currently so you should carefully evaluate it to ensure it meets your needs before choosing it as your messaging provider.