在不实例化对象的情况下获取 PropertyInfo 的默认值?

发布于 2024-12-28 05:56:18 字数 459 浏览 1 评论 0原文

我得到了这段有效的代码(简化的):

Assembly lib = Assembly.LoadFile("C:\\mydll.dll");
var libType = lib.GetTypes();
Type mvType = libType[0];
PropertyInfo WidthProperty = mvType.GetProperty("Width");

但是,我想使用类似的代码访问默认值,

var WidthPropertyValue = WidthProperty.GetValue(???, null);

事情是我们不能用 Activator.CreateInstance 实例化对象,因为构造函数需要整个巨大的项目已加载并开始工作...无论如何,这不是解决该问题的重点。 问题是,是否可以通过此策略访问默认方式? 用另一种方式可以吗? 完全不可能?

I got this code that works (simplified) :

Assembly lib = Assembly.LoadFile("C:\\mydll.dll");
var libType = lib.GetTypes();
Type mvType = libType[0];
PropertyInfo WidthProperty = mvType.GetProperty("Width");

But then, I'd like to access to the default value with a code like

var WidthPropertyValue = WidthProperty.GetValue(???, null);

The thing is that we CAN'T instantiate the object with Activator.CreateInstance cause the constructor need that the whole huge project is loaded to work... anyway, that's not the point about working around that problem.
The thing is that, is it possible to access to the default way with this strategy ?
Is it possible with another way ?
completely impossible ?

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(3

灵芸 2025-01-04 05:56:18

您需要澄清“默认值”的含义......它是属性类型的默认值吗?在这种情况下,对于引用类型来说它是 null,对于值类型来说它是使用默认构造函数创建的实例:

static object GetDefaultValue(PropertyInfo prop)
{
    if (prop.PropertyType.IsValueType)
        return Activator.CreateInstance(prop.PropertyType);
    return null;
}

如果您的意思是“使用 DefaultValueAttribute 声明的值”,您可以像这样检索它:

static object GetDefaultValue(PropertyInfo prop)
{
    var attributes = prop.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(DefaultValueAttribute), true);
    if (attributes.Length > 0)
    {
        var defaultAttr = (DefaultValueAttribute)attributes[0];
        return defaultAttr.Value;
    }

    // Attribute not found, fall back to default value for the type
    if (prop.PropertyType.IsValueType)
        return Activator.CreateInstance(prop.PropertyType);
    return null;
}

如果您想要在构造函数中分配给属性的值,则在不创建类实例的情况下无法获取它(好吧,您可以反编译代码,但这并不容易......)

You need to clarify what you mean by "the default value"... Is it the default value of the property type? In that case, it's null for a reference type, and for a value type it's an instance created with the default constructor:

static object GetDefaultValue(PropertyInfo prop)
{
    if (prop.PropertyType.IsValueType)
        return Activator.CreateInstance(prop.PropertyType);
    return null;
}

If you mean "the value declared with DefaultValueAttribute", you can retrieve it like this:

static object GetDefaultValue(PropertyInfo prop)
{
    var attributes = prop.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(DefaultValueAttribute), true);
    if (attributes.Length > 0)
    {
        var defaultAttr = (DefaultValueAttribute)attributes[0];
        return defaultAttr.Value;
    }

    // Attribute not found, fall back to default value for the type
    if (prop.PropertyType.IsValueType)
        return Activator.CreateInstance(prop.PropertyType);
    return null;
}

If you want the value assigned to the property in the constructor, there is no way to get it without creating an instance of the class (well, you could decompile the code, but it's not exactly easy...)

辞慾 2025-01-04 05:56:18

如果可以访问汇编代码,我建议使用 Attribute 定义默认值。

否则我认为这是不可能的。属性默认值不是程序集元数据的一部分(默认值概念本身不存在,这就是 DefaultValueAttribute 存在的原因),所以我不确定您是否可以在创建一个实例的情况下弄清楚它物体。它可以是任何东西:支持字段的默认值、构造函数中设置的某些值、它可能基于某些环境条件等。

更新:我已经看到了一些指向的答案/评论创建属性类型的默认类型。属性默认值是特定于实现的,而不是特定于类型的。它们在许多情况下可能是一致的,但并非必须如此。

If the assembly code is accessible I would recommend defining default values with an Attribute.

Otherwise I don't think its possible. Property default values are not part of an assembly's metadata (default value concept does not exist as such, that is why DefaultValueAttribute exists) so I'm not sure you can figure it out short of creating an instance of the object. It could be anything: default value of the backing field, some value set in the constructor, it could be based on some environment condition, etc.

UPDATE: I've seen a few answers/comments pointing to creating the default type of the property's type. Property default values are implementation specific, not type specific. They might coincide in many cases but it doesn't have to be so.

东风软 2025-01-04 05:56:18

如果该值是在构造函数中设置的,并且您实际上无法调用该构造函数,则提取该值并不容易。这是因为该值实际上嵌入到构造函数的代码中。

如果您真的很勇敢并且有很多时间,您可以尝试使用

如果通过构造函数中的字段进行设置:

  1. 确定属性的字段名称。您可以根据编码约定猜测一个名称(不太漂亮,但它可能会根据您的工具的意图完成工作),或者您可以进一步检查属性 getter 以查看它使用的字段。如果属性不仅仅返回值,那么即使这也可能很棘手。

  2. 检查构造函数代码并查找对该字段的引用。如果构造函数调用其他设置默认值的方法,这可能会很复杂。

  3. 找到感兴趣字段的 Stfld 后,立即在其上方查找常量值(Ldc_I4、Ldc_R4、Ldc_R8 或 Ldstr。)

如果通过构造函数中的属性进行设置:

  1. 确定属性设置器并在代码中查找对 setter 的调用。

  2. 与字段情况一样,在调用之前立即检查以查看加载的常量值。

如果您确实想尝试此操作,我建议您创建各种类型的构造函数并首先检查 ildasm 中的代码,以了解代码编译时的外观。在一般情况下,自动确定默认值将非常困难,但对于“常见”情况来说是可以实现的,这可能足以满足您的目的。

If the value is being set in the constructor and you can't actually call the constructor, it's not easy to extract the value. This is because the value is actually embedded in the code of the constructor.

If you're really brave and have a lot of time on your hands, you can try inspecting the IL directly using a tool like Cecil. If the property is a simple type (int, double, string, etc.) then you can do the following:

If being set via a field in the constructor:

  1. Determine the field name for the property. You can either guess a name based on coding conventions (not pretty, but it might get the job done depending on the intention of your tool) or you can do further inspection of the property getter to see what fields it uses. Even this could be tricky if the property does more than just return the value.

  2. Inspect the constructor code and look for references to the field. This could be complicated if the constructor calls other methods that set default values.

  3. Once you find the Stfld for the field of interest, look immediately above it for the constant value (Ldc_I4, Ldc_R4, Ldc_R8 or Ldstr.)

If being set via a property in the constructor:

  1. Determine the property setter and look for calls to the setter in the code.

  2. As with the field case, inspect immediately before the call to look at the loaded constant value.

If you really want to try this, I recommend creating various types of constructors and inspecting the code in ildasm first, to get an idea for how the code looks when compiled. Automatically determining the default value will be extremely difficult to do in the general case, but quite achievable for 'common' cases, which might suffice for your purposes.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文