嵌套可变参数模板:gcc 或 clang 中的错误?
以下代码无法使用 gcc 4.7 (20120114) 编译,但可以使用 clang++ 3.0 编译良好。这是 gcc、clang 中的错误还是只是因为我尝试做的事情在 c++11 中不允许?
template< typename... args >
struct A {
template< typename head, typename... tags >
struct Inner : public Inner<tags...> {
};
template< typename head >
struct Inner<head> {
// assume both args... and tags... must be used to
// calculate TYPE
typedef int TYPE;
};
};
template< typename... args >
struct B : A<args...> {
template<typename... tags>
typename A<args...>::template Inner<tags...>::TYPE x() {
return 0;
}
};
int main(int argc, const char *argv[]) {
B<int, int, int> b;
b.x<char, short, long, double>();
return 0;
}
上面的代码是我尝试做的一个非常简单的示例,但本质是我需要 args... 类型和 tag... 类型来计算函数的返回类型。这怎么能做到呢?
The following code does not compile with gcc 4.7 (20120114) , but compiles fine with clang++ 3.0. Is this a bug in gcc, clang or just because what I try to do is not allowed in c++11?
template< typename... args >
struct A {
template< typename head, typename... tags >
struct Inner : public Inner<tags...> {
};
template< typename head >
struct Inner<head> {
// assume both args... and tags... must be used to
// calculate TYPE
typedef int TYPE;
};
};
template< typename... args >
struct B : A<args...> {
template<typename... tags>
typename A<args...>::template Inner<tags...>::TYPE x() {
return 0;
}
};
int main(int argc, const char *argv[]) {
B<int, int, int> b;
b.x<char, short, long, double>();
return 0;
}
The code above is a very simplified example of what I try to do, but the essence is that I need both the args... types and the tags... types to calculate the return type of the function. How can this be done?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5906/d59060df4059a6cc364216c4d63ceec29ef7fe66" alt="扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群"
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(1)
不确定这是否是 gcc 的错误,但使其在 gcc 上编译的标准解决方案是声明空可变参数版本,然后对其进行专门化:
演示: http://ideone.com/MFKVY
Not sure if it's a bug of gcc or not, but the standard solution to make it compile on gcc is to declare the empty variadic version and then specialize it:
Demo: http://ideone.com/MFKVY