我可以将 rel=author 或 rel=publisher 与 Google plus 企业资料一起使用吗？
正如我在搜索结果中看到的很多丰富的摘要标记，他们是使用个人（人）Google+ 个人资料完成的。那太好了。
那么，如果我使用我的 Google+ 企业品牌资料进行同样的操作，这是否合法。
请查看 Google+ 个人资料以了解更多信息 https://plus.google.com/111362101795597548116
提前致谢。
As I have seen lots of rich snippets markup in search result which they have done with there individual (person) Google+ profile. And that's great.
So is it legal or not if I used my Google+ business brand profile for the same.
Please have look at the Google+ profile for more information
https://plus.google.com/111362101795597548116
Thanks in advance.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（2）
我怀疑您正在谈论可能导致 Google+ 内容添加到搜索结果中的作者标记。
据我所知，业务页面当前未以丰富的摘要形式显示。
您可以将您的 Google+ 商家信息页定义为您网站的发布商。也许将来这会产生丰富的片段。
http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin /answer.py?hl=zh-CN&answer=1708844
I suspect you are talking about the author mark-up that can cause a Google+ provide to be added to a search results.
AFAIK business pages are not currently displayed in rich snippets.
You can define your Google+ business page as the publisher for your website. Maybe in the future this could cause rich snippets.
http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=1708844
当然是合法的。只是人们已经习惯了看到真实的面孔，我怀疑这就是大多数人想要看到的。
您可能还想阅读我刚刚写的博客文章，特别是如果您使用 Wordpress：作者 Rel WordPress
Of course it's legal. It's just that people are getting used to seeing real faces, and that's what I suspect most people are going to want to see.
You might also want to read the blog post that I've just written, especially if you're using Wordpress: Author Rel Wordpress