在 svn 中防止同行评审之前提交
有没有用于同行评审的 svn hook？我想确保任何开发人员在得到同行评审之前都无法提交代码。 svn 如何强制执行此操作？
Is there any svn hook for peer review? I would like to make sure that any developer could not commit code until it gets reviewed by a peer. How can this be enforced by svn?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（2）
我在这里感觉到一个误解：如果您尝试将代码审查添加为预签入步骤，那么您将源代码存储库视为完美、理想代码的权威，但将不完美的代码排除在外。这不利于源存储库的整体实用性。代码应尽可能早地存储在存储库中。存储库中的代码是可跟踪更改的、易于访问、更易于审查且更易于备份。
因此，走简单的路线：将代码存储在分支中（可能是一个额外的
unreviewed文件夹，与branches和tags一起），并在分支发布之前对其进行审查合并到其目标分支。技术方面变得更容易，并且您不需要预提交挂钩。I sense a misunderstanding here: If you are trying to add code review as a pre-check-in step, you are treating your source repository as the authority for perfect, ideal code, but keep imperfect code out of it. This is detrimental to the overall usefulness of a source repository. Code should be in the repository as early as practically possible. Code in the repository is change-tracked, easily accessible, easier to review and easier to backup.
So, go the easy route: Store code in branches (maybe an extra
unreviewedfolder alongsidebranchesandtags) and review the branch before it gets merged into its target branch. The technical side gets easier, and you have no need for pre-commit hooks.您需要的是一个与 svn 配合使用的代码审查工具。请参阅此处获取一些建议：什么是使用 Subversion (SVN) 进行代码审查的最佳方式？ [关闭]
另请参阅 Quora 上的这个非常相似的问题，其中有一些很好的答案：最好的代码审查工具是什么？
What you need is a code review tool that works with svn. See here for some suggestions: What's the best way to do a code review with Subversion (SVN)? [closed]
Also see this very similar question on Quora which has some good answers: What are the best code review tools?