Azure AppFabric 与服务器 AppFabric - 今天
通过 Google，我在 stackoverflow 上发现了另一个关于 Azure AppFabric 和 Windows Server AppFabric 之间的差异和相似之处的问题。有人提到，AppFabric 的两个版本更加接近，甚至融合在一起。这篇文章已经发布快两年了，2012 年的今天，我仍然在努力尝试理解两个 AppFabric 版本背后的计划。
从我的角度来看，我使用过 Azure AppFabric（缓存、服务总线、ACS）并且对它很熟悉。但是当看到Server AppFabric的产品网站时，我很困惑。我错了还是缓存服务是这两种技术唯一共同拥有的东西？
谢谢
编辑：（至少，缓存相关的类和接口似乎是相同的，这是正确的吗？）
Via Google, I found another question on stackoverflow regarding the differences and similarities between Azure AppFabric and Windows Server AppFabric. It was mentioned that both versions of AppFabric come closer together or even melt together. This post is almost 2 years old and today in 2012, I still struggle with trying to unterstand the plan behind both AppFabric versions.
From my point of view, I worked with the Azure AppFabric (Caching, Service Bus, ACS) and I am familiar with it. But when look at the product website of Server AppFabric, I'm confused. Am I wrong or is the Caching Service the only thing both technologies have together?
Thank you
edit: (At least, caching related classes and interfaces seem to be indentical, is this correct?)
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（1）
Windows Azure AppFabric 作为品牌名称已不复存在；它曾经包含的技术（服务总线、访问控制服务和缓存）现在是 Windows Azure“.NET 客户端库”的一部分。您是正确的，两个 AppFabric 具有共同的缓存功能，但此时最好不要与 AppFabric 品牌混淆。想一想所涉及的技术：Windows Server AppFabric、服务总线、访问控制服务和缓存（在这组文章中：http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd163896.aspx）。
最后，虽然这篇文章有点过时，但它会给您一些历史背景：http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/1445.aspx。
Windows Azure AppFabric as a brand name doesn't exist anymore; the technologies it used to contain (Service Bus, Access Control Service, and Caching) are now part of the Windows Azure "Client Libraries for .NET". You are correct in that the two AppFabrics had Caching in common, but at this point it's best not to be confused by the AppFabric branding. Think of the technologies involved: Windows Server AppFabric, and Service Bus, Access Control Service, and Caching (within this set of articles: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd163896.aspx).
Finally, although this article is a little outdated, it will give you some of the historical context: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/1445.aspx.