ClickOnce 与 Java WebStart
我最近为我的公司创建了一个内部网站，用于启动客户端应用程序。该网站被认为是用户启动所有业务应用程序的中心位置。之所以是一个网站，是因为由于打包要求，将应用程序部署到我们公司的客户端工作站有些困难，而且我们希望尽可能使我们的客户端瘦客户端。为了实现这一目标，我目前所做的是编写一个网站，该网站启动 ClickOnce 应用程序，并通过 url 传递一些参数。该参数基本上提供了 Process.Start 的命令。
由于我们公司主要是 .net，所以我选择了 ClickOnce，但我也知道 java webstart 可以做同样的事情。事实上对我来说它的启动速度似乎也更快一些。
谁能提供 ClickOnce 和 Java webstart 之间的优缺点吗？
I recently created an internal website for my company that launches client side applications. This website is suppose to be the central place from which users will launch all their business applciations. The reason it is a website is because is somewhat difficult to deploy applications to client workstations in our compnay due to packaging requirements, and also we want to make our client thin clients as much as possible. To achieve this what I have currently done is writen a website that laucnhes a ClickOnce application with some arguments passed to it via url. The argument basically provides the command for Process.Start.
As our company is primarily .net I chose ClickOnce however I also know that java webstart can do the same thing. Infact to me it seems to launch a bit faster as well.
Can anyone please provide some pros and cons between ClickOnce and Java webstart?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（1）
它们是非常相似且具有镜面性的技术...我认为 Microsoft 已经考虑将 JavaWebStart 用于 ClickOnce 技术。但你无法比较它们，因为 ClickOnce 适用于 .NET 世界，而 JavaWebStart 仅适用于 Java 世界。
那么，如果您的工作主要基于 .NET，为什么还要评估 JavaWebStart？
PS 你知道你可以直接从网络共享使用 ClickOnce 和 JavaWebStart，我想......
They are very similar and specular technologies...I think Microsoft has thought to JavaWebStart for ClickOnce tech. But you cannot compare them because ClickOnce is for .NET world while JavaWebStart is only for Java World.
So if your work is primarily based onto .NET, why do you have to evaluate JavaWebStart?
P.S. you know that you can use ClickOnce and JavaWebStart directly from a network share, I suppose...