JSF 2.0 - 发布了哪个版本的 Facelets？
由于今天的 2.0 jsf 实现附带了facelets，我想知道它们实际上包含哪个版本。
那么基本上，mojarra 2.0 或 myfaces 2.0 附带哪个 Facelets 版本？
这个问题基本上是在浏览 richfaces 迁移指南时出现的，该指南建议一起使用 jsf 2使用 richfaces 3.3.x：“由于 RichFaces 中来自标记处理程序类的依赖性，仍应使用 Facelets 1.1.15。” 有没有一种简单的方法可以判断打包的版本？ 官方facelets页面似乎已经被废弃了。
Since todays 2.0 jsf implementation ship with facelets, I'm wondering which version they actually are including.
So basically, which facelets version ships with mojarra 2.0 or myfaces 2.0?
This question arose basically when going through the richfaces migration guide which is suggesting in context of using jsf 2 together with richfaces 3.3.x: "Facelets 1.1.15 should still be used because of dependencies in RichFaces from the Tag Handlers classes."
Is there an easy way to tell what version is packed? the official facelets page seems pretty abandoned.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（1）
JSF 2 附带了内置的 Facelets。它基本上不再是一个单独的项目（这也是为什么官方 Facelets 页面“看起来相当废弃”）。
RF 人员试图告诉您的是，您仍然需要将旧的 Facelets 1.1.15 JAR 文件包含在 JSF 2 旁边的类路径中，以便让 RF 3.3.x 标记文件运行而不会出现依赖性问题。
JSF 2 ships with Facelets builtin. It's basically not a separate project anymore (that's also why the official Facelets page "seems pretty abandoned").
What RF guys is trying to tell you is that you still need to include the old Facelets 1.1.15 JAR file in the classpath next to JSF 2 in order to get the RF 3.3.x tag files to run without dependency troubles.