将生成 SelectList 的两个方法重构为单个方法

发布于 2024-12-23 00:04:29 字数 922 浏览 2 评论 0原文

我有以下两种方法,它们从数据库获取数据并返回填充的 SelectList 对象(包括“全部”选项值),然后将其传递到我的视图。问题是它们几乎相同,只是它们都访问不同的存储库对象并且具有不同的 ID 名称(StatusId 和 TeamId)。我认为有机会将它们重构为单一方法,该方法接受存储库作为参数,并以某种方式找出 ID 名称应该是什么,也许通过使用反射或某种 lambda 表达式,但我不太知道如何来实现这一目标。

private SelectList GetStatusSelectList(int selectedStatusId)
{
  List<MemberStatus> statusList = _memberStatusRepository.All().ToList();
  statusList.Insert(0, new MemberStatus {StatusId = 0, Name = "All"});
  var statusSelectList = new SelectList(statusList, "StatusId", "Name", selectedStatusId);
  return statusSelectList;
}

private SelectList GetTeamSelectList(int selectedTeamId)
{
  List<MemberTeam> teamList = _memberTeamRepository.All().ToList();
  teamList.Insert(0, new MemberTeam { TeamId = 0, Name = "All" });
  var teamSelectList = new SelectList(teamList, "TeamId", "Name", selectedTeamId);
  return teamSelectList;
}

任何人都可以帮助弄清楚如何将这些重构为单个方法吗?

I have the following two methods that get data from my DB and return a populated SelectList object (including an "All" option value) that I then pass onto my view. The problem is that they are almost identical with the exception that they both access different repository objects and they have different ID names (StatusId and TeamId). I think there is an opportunity to refactor them into a single method that accepts the repository as a parameter and somehow figures out what the ID name should be, perhaps by using reflection or some sort of lambda expression, but I don't know quite how to accomplish this.

private SelectList GetStatusSelectList(int selectedStatusId)
{
  List<MemberStatus> statusList = _memberStatusRepository.All().ToList();
  statusList.Insert(0, new MemberStatus {StatusId = 0, Name = "All"});
  var statusSelectList = new SelectList(statusList, "StatusId", "Name", selectedStatusId);
  return statusSelectList;
}

private SelectList GetTeamSelectList(int selectedTeamId)
{
  List<MemberTeam> teamList = _memberTeamRepository.All().ToList();
  teamList.Insert(0, new MemberTeam { TeamId = 0, Name = "All" });
  var teamSelectList = new SelectList(teamList, "TeamId", "Name", selectedTeamId);
  return teamSelectList;
}

Can anyone help figure out how to refactor these into a single method?

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(5

初与友歌 2024-12-30 00:04:29

嗯,这是我能想到的最通用的方法,但它需要您的 MemberStatusMemberTeam 实现 IIdentABLE,但我不这么做。不知道是否可以适用于您的情况。如果是这样,这就是要走的路。

private SelectList GetList<T>(IRepository repository, int id, string name)
    where T : IIdentifiable, new()
{
    List<IIdentifiable> list = repository.All().ToList();
    list.Insert(0, new T() { Name = name, Id = id });
    var statusSelectList = new SelectList(list, "Id", "Name", id);
}

以及接口代码

interface IIdentifiable
{
    int Id { get; set; }
    string Name { get; set; }
}

Well, this is the most generic I can come up with, but it will require that your MemberStatus and MemberTeam implement IIdentifiable, which I don't know if can apply to your case. If so, this would be the way to go.

private SelectList GetList<T>(IRepository repository, int id, string name)
    where T : IIdentifiable, new()
{
    List<IIdentifiable> list = repository.All().ToList();
    list.Insert(0, new T() { Name = name, Id = id });
    var statusSelectList = new SelectList(list, "Id", "Name", id);
}

And the interface code

interface IIdentifiable
{
    int Id { get; set; }
    string Name { get; set; }
}
小红帽 2024-12-30 00:04:29

您可以尝试以下操作:

private SelectList GetStatusSelectList(int selectedStatusId)
{
    return GetGenericSelectList<MemberStatus>(selectedStatusId, _memberStatusRepository.All().ToList(), "StatusId");
}

private SelectList GetTeamSelectList(int selectedTeamId)
{
    return GetGenericSelectList<MemberTeam>(selectedTeamId, _memberTeamRepository.All().ToList(), "TeamId");
}

private SelectList GetGenericSelectList<T>(int selectedTeamId, List<T> list, string idFieldName) where T : new()
{
    var firstItem = new T();
    (firstItem as dynamic).Name = "All";
    var l = new List<T>(list);
    l.Insert(0, firstItem);
    return new SelectList(l, idFieldName, "Name", selectedTeamId);
}

此解决方案并不理想,并且依赖于某些约定(例如,您的所有项目都应具有 Name 属性)。然而,这似乎是一个不错的开始方式。通过使用表达式而不是属性名称可以进一步改进它——这将允许通过编译时检查来更改属性名称。

you may try the following:

private SelectList GetStatusSelectList(int selectedStatusId)
{
    return GetGenericSelectList<MemberStatus>(selectedStatusId, _memberStatusRepository.All().ToList(), "StatusId");
}

private SelectList GetTeamSelectList(int selectedTeamId)
{
    return GetGenericSelectList<MemberTeam>(selectedTeamId, _memberTeamRepository.All().ToList(), "TeamId");
}

private SelectList GetGenericSelectList<T>(int selectedTeamId, List<T> list, string idFieldName) where T : new()
{
    var firstItem = new T();
    (firstItem as dynamic).Name = "All";
    var l = new List<T>(list);
    l.Insert(0, firstItem);
    return new SelectList(l, idFieldName, "Name", selectedTeamId);
}

This solution is not ideal and relies on some conventions (e.g. all your items should have Name property). However it seems to be a not bad way to start with. It may be improved further by using Expressions instead of property names -- that would allow to change property names with compile time check.

梦幻之岛 2024-12-30 00:04:29

您可以对接口进行一些疯狂的操作,并执行以下操作:

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;

namespace ConsoleApplication3
{

    public class MemberStatus : IDefault<MemberStatus>
    {
        public int StatusId { get; set; }
        public string Name { get; set; }

        public MemberStatus Default
        {
            get { return new MemberStatus() { StatusId = 0, Name = "All" }; }
        }

        public string IdName
        {
            get { return "StatusId"; }
        }
    }

    public class MemberTeam : IDefault<MemberTeam>
    {
        public int TeamId { get; set; }
        public string Name { get; set; }

        public MemberTeam Default
        {
            get { return new MemberTeam() { TeamId = 0, Name = "All" }; }
        }

        public string IdName
        {
            get { return "TeamId"; }
        }
    }

    public interface IDefault<T>
    {
        T Default { get; }
        string IdName { get; }
    }

    public interface IRepository<T>
    {
        IEnumerable<T> All();
    }

    public class MemberStatusRepository : IRepository<MemberStatus>
    {
        public IEnumerable<MemberStatus> All()
        {
            return new[] { 
                new MemberStatus(),
                new MemberStatus()
            };
        }
    }
    public class MemberTeamRepository : IRepository<MemberTeam>
    {
        public IEnumerable<MemberTeam> All()
        {
            return new[] { 
                new MemberTeam(),
                new MemberTeam()
            };
        }
    }

    public class DataAccessLayer
    {
        IRepository<MemberStatus> _memberStatusRepository;
        IRepository<MemberTeam> _memberTeamRepository;
        public DataAccessLayer()
        {
            _memberStatusRepository = new MemberStatusRepository();
            _memberTeamRepository = new MemberTeamRepository();
        }


        public SelectList<TResult> GetTeamSelectList<TRepository, TResult>(TRepository repo, int selectedTeamId)
            where TRepository : IRepository<TResult>
            where TResult : IDefault<TResult>, new()
        {
            List<TResult> teamList = repo.All().ToList();
            var dummyobj = new TResult();
            teamList.Insert(0, dummyobj.Default);
            var teamSelectList = new SelectList<TResult>(teamList, dummyobj.IdName, "Name", selectedTeamId);
            return teamSelectList;
        }
    }

    class Program
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            var dal = new DataAccessLayer();
            SelectList<MemberStatus> results = dal.GetTeamSelectList<IRepository<MemberStatus>, MemberStatus>(new MemberStatusRepository(), 5);
            Console.WriteLine();
            Console.Read();
        }
    }

    public class SelectList<TResult>
    {
        public SelectList(List<TResult> teamList, string p, string p_2, int selectedTeamId)
        {

        }
    }

}

如果您可以在接口中定义静态属性,那就太好了,但由于您不能,所以我只能依靠创建一个虚拟对象来代替。

You can go a little interface crazy and do the following:

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;

namespace ConsoleApplication3
{

    public class MemberStatus : IDefault<MemberStatus>
    {
        public int StatusId { get; set; }
        public string Name { get; set; }

        public MemberStatus Default
        {
            get { return new MemberStatus() { StatusId = 0, Name = "All" }; }
        }

        public string IdName
        {
            get { return "StatusId"; }
        }
    }

    public class MemberTeam : IDefault<MemberTeam>
    {
        public int TeamId { get; set; }
        public string Name { get; set; }

        public MemberTeam Default
        {
            get { return new MemberTeam() { TeamId = 0, Name = "All" }; }
        }

        public string IdName
        {
            get { return "TeamId"; }
        }
    }

    public interface IDefault<T>
    {
        T Default { get; }
        string IdName { get; }
    }

    public interface IRepository<T>
    {
        IEnumerable<T> All();
    }

    public class MemberStatusRepository : IRepository<MemberStatus>
    {
        public IEnumerable<MemberStatus> All()
        {
            return new[] { 
                new MemberStatus(),
                new MemberStatus()
            };
        }
    }
    public class MemberTeamRepository : IRepository<MemberTeam>
    {
        public IEnumerable<MemberTeam> All()
        {
            return new[] { 
                new MemberTeam(),
                new MemberTeam()
            };
        }
    }

    public class DataAccessLayer
    {
        IRepository<MemberStatus> _memberStatusRepository;
        IRepository<MemberTeam> _memberTeamRepository;
        public DataAccessLayer()
        {
            _memberStatusRepository = new MemberStatusRepository();
            _memberTeamRepository = new MemberTeamRepository();
        }


        public SelectList<TResult> GetTeamSelectList<TRepository, TResult>(TRepository repo, int selectedTeamId)
            where TRepository : IRepository<TResult>
            where TResult : IDefault<TResult>, new()
        {
            List<TResult> teamList = repo.All().ToList();
            var dummyobj = new TResult();
            teamList.Insert(0, dummyobj.Default);
            var teamSelectList = new SelectList<TResult>(teamList, dummyobj.IdName, "Name", selectedTeamId);
            return teamSelectList;
        }
    }

    class Program
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            var dal = new DataAccessLayer();
            SelectList<MemberStatus> results = dal.GetTeamSelectList<IRepository<MemberStatus>, MemberStatus>(new MemberStatusRepository(), 5);
            Console.WriteLine();
            Console.Read();
        }
    }

    public class SelectList<TResult>
    {
        public SelectList(List<TResult> teamList, string p, string p_2, int selectedTeamId)
        {

        }
    }

}

It would be nice if you could define static properties in an interface, but since you can't I rely on creating a dummy object instead.

思念满溢 2024-12-30 00:04:29

据我所知,除了确定正确的存储库之外,将其重构为单个方法的主要障碍是 new MemberStatusnew MemberTeam 调用。使用。

要提出一个优雅的解决方案,您需要配置更多的基础设施 - 基本上您需要根据类型解析正确的存储库,并且您需要某种工厂来构建对象实例。

以下将代码重构为单个方法,但(在我看来)并不比您已有的单独方法更好:

private SelectList GetSelectList<T>(int selectedId, Func<List<T>> repoAllFunc, Func<T> typeNewFunc, string idName)
{
    List<T> list = repoAllFunc();
    list.Insert(0, typeNewFunc());
    var selectList = new SelectList(list, idName, "Name", selectedId);
    return selectList;
}

然后您可以这样调用它:

var memberStatusSelectList = 
    GetSelectList<MemberStatus>(
        id, 
        () => _memberStatusRepository.All().ToList(),
        () => new MemberStatus {StatusId = 0, Name = "All"});

From what I see, the main hurdles in the way of refactoring this into a single method are the new MemberStatus and the new MemberTeam calls, in addition to determining the right repository to use.

To come up with an elegant solution, you would need a little more infrastructure configured - basically you would need to resolve the correct repository based on the type and you would want to have some sort of factory build up the object instance.

The following will refactor the code into a single method, but isn't (in my opinion) any better than the separate methods you already have:

private SelectList GetSelectList<T>(int selectedId, Func<List<T>> repoAllFunc, Func<T> typeNewFunc, string idName)
{
    List<T> list = repoAllFunc();
    list.Insert(0, typeNewFunc());
    var selectList = new SelectList(list, idName, "Name", selectedId);
    return selectList;
}

You could then call it like this:

var memberStatusSelectList = 
    GetSelectList<MemberStatus>(
        id, 
        () => _memberStatusRepository.All().ToList(),
        () => new MemberStatus {StatusId = 0, Name = "All"});
英雄似剑 2024-12-30 00:04:29

如果 IRepository 添加一些“功能”,您将获得一些更清晰的代码。

使用 SingleRecordsWithAllRecord() 方法代替 All() 来处理前两行。然后让存储库定义自己的 DataValueFieldDataTextField

private SelectList GetSelectList(IRepository repo, int selectedId)
{
   var selectListAll = repo.SingleRecordsWithAllRecord().ToList();

   return new SelectList(selectListAll, 
                         repo.DataValueField, 
                         repo.DataTextField, 
                         selectedId);
}

If IRepository adds a few "features," you'll get some cleaner code.

Instead of All() have a SingleRecordsWithAllRecord() method that handles the first two lines. Then have the repository define its own DataValueField and DataTextField.

private SelectList GetSelectList(IRepository repo, int selectedId)
{
   var selectListAll = repo.SingleRecordsWithAllRecord().ToList();

   return new SelectList(selectListAll, 
                         repo.DataValueField, 
                         repo.DataTextField, 
                         selectedId);
}
~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文