作为 WCF 数据契约的 ObservableCollection 和 CollectionChanged 事件

发布于 2024-12-22 09:24:52 字数 909 浏览 0 评论 0原文

我将 DataContract 与 ObservableCollection 结合使用:

[DataContract(Namespace = Terms.MyNamespace)]
public class MyContract 
{
internal MyContract ()
        {
            List = new ObservableCollection<string>();
        }
[DataMember]
private ObservableCollection<string> list;

[XmlArray("list")]
        public ObservableCollection<string> List
        {
            get
            {
                return list;
            }
            set
            {
                list = value;
                list.CollectionChanged += (s, e) =>
                    { 
                        Console.WriteLine("It is never happens!! Why?"); 
                    };
            }
        }
...

所以,当我像这样处理我的集合时。

MyContract contract = new MyContract();
contract.List.Add("some");

项目已添加,但 CollectionChanged 事件未触发。

为什么?

I use DataContract with ObservableCollection:

[DataContract(Namespace = Terms.MyNamespace)]
public class MyContract 
{
internal MyContract ()
        {
            List = new ObservableCollection<string>();
        }
[DataMember]
private ObservableCollection<string> list;

[XmlArray("list")]
        public ObservableCollection<string> List
        {
            get
            {
                return list;
            }
            set
            {
                list = value;
                list.CollectionChanged += (s, e) =>
                    { 
                        Console.WriteLine("It is never happens!! Why?"); 
                    };
            }
        }
...

So, when I work with my collection like this.

MyContract contract = new MyContract();
contract.List.Add("some");

Item was been added but CollectionChanged event not fired.

Why?

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(1

焚却相思 2024-12-29 09:24:52

这是因为您在序列化 list 时没有序列化 List。因此,在反序列化期间,它不会调用列表的setter,因此不会订阅事件。在您的情况下,您可以简单地用 DataMemberAttribute 而不是 list 标记 List,例如:

[DataContract]
public class MyContract
{
    private ObservableCollection<string> list;

    internal MyContract()
    {
        List = new ObservableCollection<string>();
    }

    [DataMember]
    public ObservableCollection<string> List
    {
        get
        {
            return list;
        }
        private set
        {
            list = value;
            list.CollectionChanged += 
               (s, e) => 
                   Console.WriteLine("It is never happens!! Why? - Are you sure?!");
        }
    }
}

用法:

var obj = new MyContract();

var serializer = new DataContractSerializer(typeof(MyContract));

using (var ms = new MemoryStream())
{
    serializer.WriteObject(ms, obj);

    ms.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);

    var result = serializer.ReadObject(ms) as MyContract;

    result.List.Add("a");
}

在这种情况下,事件将触发。

That is because you don't serialize List while serialize list. So, during deserialization it won't call setter of list, therefore won't subscribe to event. In your case you can simply mark List with DataMemberAttribute instead of list, e.g.:

[DataContract]
public class MyContract
{
    private ObservableCollection<string> list;

    internal MyContract()
    {
        List = new ObservableCollection<string>();
    }

    [DataMember]
    public ObservableCollection<string> List
    {
        get
        {
            return list;
        }
        private set
        {
            list = value;
            list.CollectionChanged += 
               (s, e) => 
                   Console.WriteLine("It is never happens!! Why? - Are you sure?!");
        }
    }
}

Usage:

var obj = new MyContract();

var serializer = new DataContractSerializer(typeof(MyContract));

using (var ms = new MemoryStream())
{
    serializer.WriteObject(ms, obj);

    ms.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);

    var result = serializer.ReadObject(ms) as MyContract;

    result.List.Add("a");
}

In this case event will fire.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文