For RTC, the "Embedded Version Control Repository" is Jazz source control. And RTC is based on a "Based on open standards & frameworks": Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration (OSLC). See "Jazz Integration Architecture Overview".
The main point regarding RTC is that is an IBM product, meaning choosing that kind of product is often part of a larger set of tools/servers/services linked to IBM for your company.
发布评论
评论（1）
这些工具都是应用程序生命周期管理（就像您在问题中提到的那样），它们的目标都是简化开发生命周期。
目前正在部署 RTC，我可以确认 Polarion 网站上列出的功能比较表 是...充其量是不诚实的。
据我所知，这两款产品都具备所有功能。
对于 RTC，“嵌入式版本控制存储库”是 Jazz 源代码控制。
而RTC是基于一个“基于开放标准和框架”：生命周期协作开放服务（OSLC）。请参阅“Jazz 集成架构概述”。
关于 RTC 的要点是它是 IBM 产品，这意味着选择此类产品通常是为您的公司链接到 IBM 的一组更大的工具/服务器/服务的一部分。
Those tools are both Application Life Management (like you mention in your question), and they both aims at streamlining the development lifecycle.
Currently deploying RTC, I can confirm that the feature comparison chart listed on Polarion site is... disingenuous at best.
From what I can see, all features are present on both products.
For RTC, the "Embedded Version Control Repository" is Jazz source control.
And RTC is based on a "Based on open standards & frameworks": Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration (OSLC). See "Jazz Integration Architecture Overview".
The main point regarding RTC is that is an IBM product, meaning choosing that kind of product is often part of a larger set of tools/servers/services linked to IBM for your company.