JMock触发AssertionError:预期调用一次,从未调用 - 但它已被调用

发布于 2024-12-20 18:41:08 字数 3170 浏览 2 评论 0原文

我对 java 编程还很陌生,但我尝试直接从单元测试开始,因此也使用了 JMock。我已经实现了一些有效的测试用例(使用 JMock),但是我无法运行这个测试用例。

我做了什么: 我编写了一个测试类,它创建一个模拟对象,然后我期望一个(使用 oneOf)调用。运行单元测试后,它说它失败了(但日志说不然,因为我使用 will(returnValue(x)) 打印出调用时返回的数据。

下一个有趣/奇怪的事情是- 如果我将 oneOf 更改为“从不”,单元测试会成功,但会抛出异常:

Exception in thread "Thread-2" java.lang.AssertionError: unexpected invocation: blockingQueue.take()

期望: 预期永远不会,永远不会调用:blockingQueue.take();回报 在此之前发生了什么:什么都没有!

这里是代码:

@RunWith(JMock.class)
public class ExecuteGameRunnableTest {
    private Mockery context = new JUnit4Mockery();
    private Thread testObject;
    private BlockingQueue<Game> queueMock;
    private Executor executorMock;

    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    @Before
    public void setUp() {
        queueMock = context.mock(BlockingQueue.class);
        executorMock = context.mock(Executor.class);
        testObject = new Thread(new ExecuteGameRunnable(queueMock, executorMock, true));
    }

    @After
    public void tearDown() {
        queueMock = null;
        executorMock = null;
        testObject = null;
    }

    @Test
    public void testQueueTake() throws InterruptedException {
        final Game game = new Game();
        game.setId(1);
        game.setProcessing(false);
        context.checking(new Expectations() {{
            never(queueMock).take(); will(returnValue(game));
        }});
        testObject.start();
        context.assertIsSatisfied();
    }
}

以及我正在测试的可运行程序:

public class ExecuteGameRunnable implements Runnable {
    private BlockingQueue<Game> queue;
    private Executor executor;
    private Boolean unitTesting = false;
    static Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(ExecuteGameRunnable.class);

    public ExecuteGameRunnable(BlockingQueue<Game> queue, Executor executor) {
        this.queue = queue;
        this.executor = executor;
    }

    public ExecuteGameRunnable (BlockingQueue<Game> queue, Executor executor, Boolean unitTesting) {
        this(queue,executor);
        this.unitTesting = unitTesting;
    }

    public void run() {
        try {
            do {
                if (Thread.interrupted()) throw new InterruptedException();
                Game game = queue.take();
                logger.info("Game "+game.getId()+" taken. Checking if it is processing"); // THIS ONE PRINTS OUT THE GAME ID THAT I RETURN WITH JMOCK-FRAMEWORK
                if (game.isProcessing()) {
                    continue;
                }
                game.updateProcessing(true);

                executor.execute(new Runnable() {

                    @Override
                    public void run() {
                        // TODO Auto-generated method stub

                    }
                });
            } while (!unitTesting);
        } catch (InterruptedException ex) {
            logger.info("Game-Execution-Executor interrupted.");
            return;
        } catch (DataSourceException ex) {
            logger.fatal("Unable to connect to DB whilst executing game: "+id_game,ex);
            return;
        }
    }
}

I'm pretty new to programming with java but I've tried to directly start with unit-testing and therefore also used JMock. I have already implemented some test-cases (with JMock) that work, but this one I just can't get to run.

What I did:
I wrote a test-class which creates a mock object and then I'm expectation one (using oneOf) invocation. After running the unit test it says it fails (but the logs say otherwise, as i print out the data I returned at the invocation using will(returnValue(x)).

The next funny/weird thing is - if I change the oneOf to "never" the unit test succeeds, but it throws an Exception:

Exception in thread "Thread-2" java.lang.AssertionError: unexpected invocation: blockingQueue.take()

expectations:
expected never, never invoked: blockingQueue.take(); returns
what happened before this: nothing!

Here the code:

@RunWith(JMock.class)
public class ExecuteGameRunnableTest {
    private Mockery context = new JUnit4Mockery();
    private Thread testObject;
    private BlockingQueue<Game> queueMock;
    private Executor executorMock;

    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    @Before
    public void setUp() {
        queueMock = context.mock(BlockingQueue.class);
        executorMock = context.mock(Executor.class);
        testObject = new Thread(new ExecuteGameRunnable(queueMock, executorMock, true));
    }

    @After
    public void tearDown() {
        queueMock = null;
        executorMock = null;
        testObject = null;
    }

    @Test
    public void testQueueTake() throws InterruptedException {
        final Game game = new Game();
        game.setId(1);
        game.setProcessing(false);
        context.checking(new Expectations() {{
            never(queueMock).take(); will(returnValue(game));
        }});
        testObject.start();
        context.assertIsSatisfied();
    }
}

and the runnable that I'm testing:

public class ExecuteGameRunnable implements Runnable {
    private BlockingQueue<Game> queue;
    private Executor executor;
    private Boolean unitTesting = false;
    static Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(ExecuteGameRunnable.class);

    public ExecuteGameRunnable(BlockingQueue<Game> queue, Executor executor) {
        this.queue = queue;
        this.executor = executor;
    }

    public ExecuteGameRunnable (BlockingQueue<Game> queue, Executor executor, Boolean unitTesting) {
        this(queue,executor);
        this.unitTesting = unitTesting;
    }

    public void run() {
        try {
            do {
                if (Thread.interrupted()) throw new InterruptedException();
                Game game = queue.take();
                logger.info("Game "+game.getId()+" taken. Checking if it is processing"); // THIS ONE PRINTS OUT THE GAME ID THAT I RETURN WITH JMOCK-FRAMEWORK
                if (game.isProcessing()) {
                    continue;
                }
                game.updateProcessing(true);

                executor.execute(new Runnable() {

                    @Override
                    public void run() {
                        // TODO Auto-generated method stub

                    }
                });
            } while (!unitTesting);
        } catch (InterruptedException ex) {
            logger.info("Game-Execution-Executor interrupted.");
            return;
        } catch (DataSourceException ex) {
            logger.fatal("Unable to connect to DB whilst executing game: "+id_game,ex);
            return;
        }
    }
}

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(1

淡莣 2024-12-27 18:41:08

JMock 不是线程安全的。它旨在支持单元测试,而不是非常小的集成测试。坦率地说,在这种情况下,我会使用真正的 BlockingQueue 而不是模拟的。并且您的生产代码中不应该有 unitTesting 标志。

另一件事是,您不需要将测试类中的字段设置为 null,jUnit 会为每个测试刷新实例。

JMock isn't thread safe. It's intended to support unit testing, rather than what is a very small integration test. Frankly, in this case I'd use a real BlockingQueue rather than a mock one. And there is no way you should have a unitTesting flag in your production code.

One more thing, you don't need to set the fields in the test class to null, jUnit flushes the instance for every test.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文