Cognos 8.4.1/TFS 集成

发布于 2024-12-20 00:23:40 字数 238 浏览 0 评论 0原文

我的团队使用 TFS 2010 对所有 .NET 和 Java 项目进行源代码控制、构建等,并且我们希望对 Cognos 报告执行相同的操作。今天,我们必须将 Cognos 报告从开发环境导出到 XML 文件中,然后将其存储在源代码存储库中。这显然不是最佳的,并且会导致流程容易出错。

有谁知道是否有更好的方法将 Cognos 报告集成到 TFS 中?我愿意使用 SDK 并在必要时编写一些小的集成,但我想知道这是否可能。

谢谢!

My team uses TFS 2010 for source control, build, etc. for all of our .NET and Java projects, and we would like to do the same for our Cognos reports. Today we have to export the Cognos reports from the development environment into an XML file, which we can then store in the source code repository. This is obviously not optimal and leaves the process open for mistakes.

Does anyone know if there is a better way to integrate Cognos reports into TFS? I'm open to using the SDK and writing some minor integrations if necessary, but I'd like to know if it's even possible.

Thanks!

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(1

北恋 2024-12-27 00:23:41

我们还将报告导出为 XML,然后在我们的版本控制系统中手动维护它们。如果您愿意,您可以按照您的建议使用 Cognos SDK 编写一个实用程序来处理此问题。 SDK 使您能够做到这一点。或者,您可以使用现有的第三方工具之一,为您将版本控制放入 Cognos Connection 中。示例包括:-

  1. MotioCI 来自 Motio
  2. 来自 BSP 的集成控制套件

显然,好处是使用 SDK 的好处是可以节省金钱,并且可以将东西集成到现有的 VCS 中。缺点是,您需要花费时间来完成此操作,并且可能会出现错误。

使用上面列出的产品之一的好处是,您可以获得一个非常成熟的解决方案,甚至超越您所想象的简单代码控制。缺点是你必须有钱才能做到这一点。

希望这些想法有所帮助,并且需要澄清的是,我与上述任何一家公司都没有任何关系。

We also export reports to XML, and then manually maintain them in our version control system. You could if you wanted to, as you suggest, use the Cognos SDK to write a utility that handles this for you. The SDK gives you the ability to do this. Alternatively, you could use one of the existing third party tools that are available out there that put version control into Cognos Connection for you. Examples include:-

  1. MotioCI from Motio
  2. Integrated Control Suite from BSP

Obviously, the upside of using the SDK is you save yourself money, and you can integrate things into your existing VCS. On the downside, you have the time it takes you to do it, and the possibility of bugs.

The upside of using one of the products listed above is that you get a very mature solution which goes even beyond simple code control like you're thinking of. The downside is that you have to have the money for it.

Hope these thoughts help, and just to be clear, I have no connection with either of the companies linked to above.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文