Depends on the version of the LGPL it's using. If version 2, you do not need to supply your source code until asked for it. That's the way the license is written. However, when it's asked for, you will need to provide it via some easily accessible medium.
If it's LGPLv3, my suggestion is to find another library. The GPLv3 family of licenses are not compatible with AppStore distribution at all.
发布评论
评论（2）
LGPL 许可证规定您需要提供三位：
这是乏味和复杂的，但非常可行。
The LGPL license says you need to provide three bits:
It is tedious and complicated, but very doable.
用通常的 IANAL 开头：
取决于它使用的 LGPL 版本。如果是版本 2，则在要求之前您不需要提供源代码。许可证就是这样写的。但是，当需要时，您将需要通过一些易于访问的媒介来提供。
如果是 LGPLv3，我的建议是寻找另一个库。 GPLv3 系列许可证与 AppStore 分发根本不兼容。
Prefacing this with the usual IANAL:
Depends on the version of the LGPL it's using. If version 2, you do not need to supply your source code until asked for it. That's the way the license is written. However, when it's asked for, you will need to provide it via some easily accessible medium.
If it's LGPLv3, my suggestion is to find another library. The GPLv3 family of licenses are not compatible with AppStore distribution at all.