奇怪的 ActiveRecord 平等问题
我已经通过覆盖 == 运算符相当简单地为我的实际应用程序修复了这个问题,但这让我发疯,我无法找到解释。据我所知,ActiveRecord 应该仅通过 id 字段来确定两个现有记录的相等性,对吧?
显然,不!
Loading development environment (Rails 3.0.4)
irb(main):001:0> c = ChallengeClaim.find(1)
=> #<ChallengeClaim id: 1, collection_id: 954, creation_id: nil, creation_type: nil, request_signup_id: 2, request_prompt_id: 5, claiming_user_id: 8, sent_at: nil, fulfilled_at: nil, defaulted_at: nil, created_at: "2011-09-23 04:39:07", updated_at: "2011-09-23 04:39:07">
irb(main):002:0> c2 = ChallengeClaim.find(2)
=> #<ChallengeClaim id: 2, collection_id: 954, creation_id: nil, creation_type: nil, request_signup_id: 2, request_prompt_id: 4, claiming_user_id: 8, sent_at: nil, fulfilled_at: nil, defaulted_at: nil, created_at: "2011-11-07 17:47:33", updated_at: "2011-11-07 17:47:33">
irb(main):003:0> c == c2
=> true
?!?!?!
非常欢迎任何解释,这样我晚上就可以再次入睡了。 :>
I've fixed this for my actual app fairly trivially by overriding the == operator, but it is driving me nuts and I haven't been able to find an explanation. As far as I know, ActiveRecord is supposed to determine the equality of two existing records just via the id field, right?
Apparently, no!
Loading development environment (Rails 3.0.4)
irb(main):001:0> c = ChallengeClaim.find(1)
=> #<ChallengeClaim id: 1, collection_id: 954, creation_id: nil, creation_type: nil, request_signup_id: 2, request_prompt_id: 5, claiming_user_id: 8, sent_at: nil, fulfilled_at: nil, defaulted_at: nil, created_at: "2011-09-23 04:39:07", updated_at: "2011-09-23 04:39:07">
irb(main):002:0> c2 = ChallengeClaim.find(2)
=> #<ChallengeClaim id: 2, collection_id: 954, creation_id: nil, creation_type: nil, request_signup_id: 2, request_prompt_id: 4, claiming_user_id: 8, sent_at: nil, fulfilled_at: nil, defaulted_at: nil, created_at: "2011-11-07 17:47:33", updated_at: "2011-11-07 17:47:33">
irb(main):003:0> c == c2
=> true
?!?!!??!
Any explanations gratefully welcomed so I can sleep at night again. :>
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(1)
正如 Chris Heald 在上面的评论中指出的那样,比较运算符 <=> 确实是这样的。是在 ChallengeClaim 上定义的!
As Chris Heald pointed out above in the comments, indeed the comparison operator <=> was defined on ChallengeClaim!