We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for software libraries, tutorials, tools, books, or other off-site resources. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 2 years ago.
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
接受
或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
发布评论
评论(2)
我怀疑你真的可以开发一个可以做到这一点的程序......这实际上取决于你正在构建的内容。规范化并不能决定“好的”设计。
I doubt you can really develop a program that can do this ... it really depends on what you're building. Normalization does not determine "good" design.
TOAD 是最流行的工具(抱歉,不是 OSS)。
http://www.quest.com/toad-for-oracle/
它'它将帮助您发现设计中的一些问题,但这也不是灵丹妙药。除了 TOAD 之外,我还没有看到任何其他工具比手动审核模式更有用。还有其他想法吗?
TOAD is the most popular tool for this (sorry, not OSS).
http://www.quest.com/toad-for-oracle/
It'll help you find some issues with your design, but it's not a magic bullet either. Other than TOAD I haven't seen any other tool that comes close to being useful as opposed to manual auditing of the schema. Any other ideas?