不同状态下不同的词法分析器规则
我一直在为 HTML 中嵌入的某些模板语言(FreeMarker)开发解析器,例如:
${abc}
<html>
<head>
<title>Welcome!</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>
Welcome ${user}<#if user == "Big Joe">, our beloved
leader</#if>!
</h1>
<p>Our latest product:
<a href="${latestProduct}">${latestProduct}</a>!
</body>
</html>
模板语言位于某些特定标签之间,例如 '${' '}'、'<#' '> '。中间的其他原始文本可以被视为相同的标记(RAW)。
这里的关键点是,相同的文本(例如整数)对于解析器来说意味着不同的东西,这取决于它是否在这些标签之间,因此需要被视为不同的标记。
我尝试过以下丑陋的实现,并使用自定义状态来指示它是否在这些标签中。正如你所看到的,我几乎必须检查每条规则中的状态,这让我发疯......
我还考虑了以下两个解决方案:
使用多个词法分析器。当这些标签内部/外部时,我可以在两个词法分析器之间切换。然而,ANTLR3 的相关文档很差。我不知道如何让一个解析器共享两个不同的词法分析器并在它们之间切换。
将 RAW 规则向上移动到 NUMERICAL_ESCAPE 规则之后。检查那里的状态,如果它在标签中,则放回令牌并继续尝试左侧规则。这将节省大量的状态检查。但是,我没有找到任何“放回”功能,并且 ANTLR 抱怨某些规则永远无法匹配...
对此有一个优雅的解决方案吗?
grammar freemarker_simple;
@lexer::members {
int freemarker_type = 0;
}
expression
: primary_expression ;
primary_expression
: number_literal | identifier | parenthesis | builtin_variable
;
parenthesis
: OPEN_PAREN expression CLOSE_PAREN ;
number_literal
: INTEGER | DECIMAL
;
identifier
: ID
;
builtin_variable
: DOT ID
;
string_output
: OUTPUT_ESCAPE expression CLOSE_BRACE
;
numerical_output
: NUMERICAL_ESCAPE expression CLOSE_BRACE
;
if_expression
: START_TAG IF expression DIRECTIVE_END optional_block
( START_TAG ELSE_IF expression loose_directive_end optional_block )*
( END_TAG ELSE optional_block )?
END_TAG END_IF
;
list : START_TAG LIST expression AS ID DIRECTIVE_END optional_block END_TAG END_LIST ;
for_each
: START_TAG FOREACH ID IN expression DIRECTIVE_END optional_block END_TAG END_FOREACH ;
loose_directive_end
: ( DIRECTIVE_END | EMPTY_DIRECTIVE_END ) ;
freemarker_directive
: ( if_expression | list | for_each ) ;
content : ( RAW | string_output | numerical_output | freemarker_directive ) + ;
optional_block
: ( content )? ;
root : optional_block EOF ;
START_TAG
: '<#'
{ freemarker_type = 1; }
;
END_TAG : '</#'
{ freemarker_type = 1; }
;
DIRECTIVE_END
: '>'
{
if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW;
freemarker_type = 0;
}
;
EMPTY_DIRECTIVE_END
: '/>'
{
if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW;
freemarker_type = 0;
}
;
OUTPUT_ESCAPE
: '${'
{ if(freemarker_type == 0) freemarker_type = 2; }
;
NUMERICAL_ESCAPE
: '#{'
{ if(freemarker_type == 0) freemarker_type = 2; }
;
IF : 'if'
{ if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; }
;
ELSE : 'else' DIRECTIVE_END
{ if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; }
;
ELSE_IF : 'elseif'
{ if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; }
;
LIST : 'list'
{ if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; }
;
FOREACH : 'foreach'
{ if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; }
;
END_IF : 'if' DIRECTIVE_END
{ if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; }
;
END_LIST
: 'list' DIRECTIVE_END
{ if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; }
;
END_FOREACH
: 'foreach' DIRECTIVE_END
{ if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; }
;
FALSE: 'false' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
TRUE: 'true' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
INTEGER: ('0'..'9')+ { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
DECIMAL: INTEGER '.' INTEGER { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
DOT: '.' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
DOT_DOT: '..' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
PLUS: '+' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
MINUS: '-' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
TIMES: '*' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
DIVIDE: '/' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
PERCENT: '%' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
AND: '&' | '&&' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
OR: '|' | '||' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
EXCLAM: '!' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
OPEN_PAREN: '(' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
CLOSE_PAREN: ')' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
OPEN_BRACE
: '{'
{ if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; }
;
CLOSE_BRACE
: '}'
{
if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW;
if(freemarker_type == 2) freemarker_type = 0;
}
;
IN: 'in' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
AS: 'as' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
ID : ('A'..'Z'|'a'..'z')+
//{ if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; }
;
BLANK : ( '\r' | ' ' | '\n' | '\t' )+
{
if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW;
else $channel = HIDDEN;
}
;
RAW
: .
;
编辑
我发现问题类似于 How do I lex this input? ,其中需要一个“启动条件”。但不幸的是,答案也使用了很多谓词,就像我的状态一样。
现在,我尝试用谓词将 RAW 移得更高。希望在 RAW 规则之后消除所有状态检查。但是,我的示例输入失败,第一行末尾被识别为空白,而不是应为的原始。
我猜规则优先级有问题: CLOSE_BRACE 匹配后,下一个 token 会从 CLOSE_BRACE 规则之后的规则开始匹配,而不是从头开始。
有办法解决这个问题吗?
下面的新语法带有一些调试输出:
grammar freemarker_simple;
@lexer::members {
int freemarker_type = 0;
}
expression
: primary_expression ;
primary_expression
: number_literal | identifier | parenthesis | builtin_variable
;
parenthesis
: OPEN_PAREN expression CLOSE_PAREN ;
number_literal
: INTEGER | DECIMAL
;
identifier
: ID
;
builtin_variable
: DOT ID
;
string_output
: OUTPUT_ESCAPE expression CLOSE_BRACE
;
numerical_output
: NUMERICAL_ESCAPE expression CLOSE_BRACE
;
if_expression
: START_TAG IF expression DIRECTIVE_END optional_block
( START_TAG ELSE_IF expression loose_directive_end optional_block )*
( END_TAG ELSE optional_block )?
END_TAG END_IF
;
list : START_TAG LIST expression AS ID DIRECTIVE_END optional_block END_TAG END_LIST ;
for_each
: START_TAG FOREACH ID IN expression DIRECTIVE_END optional_block END_TAG END_FOREACH ;
loose_directive_end
: ( DIRECTIVE_END | EMPTY_DIRECTIVE_END ) ;
freemarker_directive
: ( if_expression | list | for_each ) ;
content : ( RAW | string_output | numerical_output | freemarker_directive ) + ;
optional_block
: ( content )? ;
root : optional_block EOF ;
START_TAG
: '<#'
{ freemarker_type = 1; }
;
END_TAG : '</#'
{ freemarker_type = 1; }
;
OUTPUT_ESCAPE
: '${'
{ if(freemarker_type == 0) freemarker_type = 2; }
;
NUMERICAL_ESCAPE
: '#{'
{ if(freemarker_type == 0) freemarker_type = 2; }
;
RAW
:
{ freemarker_type == 0 }?=> .
{System.out.printf("RAW \%s \%d\n",getText(),freemarker_type);}
;
DIRECTIVE_END
: '>'
{ if(freemarker_type == 1) freemarker_type = 0; }
;
EMPTY_DIRECTIVE_END
: '/>'
{ if(freemarker_type == 1) freemarker_type = 0; }
;
IF : 'if'
;
ELSE : 'else' DIRECTIVE_END
;
ELSE_IF : 'elseif'
;
LIST : 'list'
;
FOREACH : 'foreach'
;
END_IF : 'if' DIRECTIVE_END
;
END_LIST
: 'list' DIRECTIVE_END
;
END_FOREACH
: 'foreach' DIRECTIVE_END
;
FALSE: 'false' ;
TRUE: 'true' ;
INTEGER: ('0'..'9')+ ;
DECIMAL: INTEGER '.' INTEGER ;
DOT: '.' ;
DOT_DOT: '..' ;
PLUS: '+' ;
MINUS: '-' ;
TIMES: '*' ;
DIVIDE: '/' ;
PERCENT: '%' ;
AND: '&' | '&&' ;
OR: '|' | '||' ;
EXCLAM: '!' ;
OPEN_PAREN: '(' ;
CLOSE_PAREN: ')' ;
OPEN_BRACE
: '{'
;
CLOSE_BRACE
: '}'
{ if(freemarker_type == 2) {freemarker_type = 0;} }
;
IN: 'in' ;
AS: 'as' ;
ID : ('A'..'Z'|'a'..'z')+
{ System.out.printf("ID \%s \%d\n",getText(),freemarker_type);}
;
BLANK : ( '\r' | ' ' | '\n' | '\t' )+
{
System.out.printf("BLANK \%d\n",freemarker_type);
$channel = HIDDEN;
}
;
我的输入结果与输出:
ID abc 2
BLANK 0 <<< incorrect, should be RAW when state==0
RAW < 0 <<< correct
ID html 0 <<< incorrect, should be RAW RAW RAW RAW
RAW > 0
EDIT2
还尝试了 Bart 语法的第二种方法,仍然不起作用,“html”被识别为 ID,应该是 4 个 RAW。当mmode=false时,RAW不是应该先匹配吗?或者词法分析器仍然选择最长的匹配?
grammar freemarker_bart;
options {
output=AST;
ASTLabelType=CommonTree;
}
tokens {
FILE;
OUTPUT;
RAW_BLOCK;
}
@parser::members {
// merge a given list of tokens into a single AST
private CommonTree merge(List tokenList) {
StringBuilder b = new StringBuilder();
for(int i = 0; i < tokenList.size(); i++) {
Token token = (Token)tokenList.get(i);
b.append(token.getText());
}
return new CommonTree(new CommonToken(RAW, b.toString()));
}
}
@lexer::members {
private boolean mmode = false;
}
parse
: content* EOF -> ^(FILE content*)
;
content
: (options {greedy=true;}: t+=RAW)+ -> ^(RAW_BLOCK {merge($t)})
| if_stat
| output
;
if_stat
: TAG_START IF expression TAG_END raw_block TAG_END_START IF TAG_END -> ^(IF expression raw_block)
;
output
: OUTPUT_START expression OUTPUT_END -> ^(OUTPUT expression)
;
raw_block
: (t+=RAW)* -> ^(RAW_BLOCK {merge($t)})
;
expression
: eq_expression
;
eq_expression
: atom (EQUALS^ atom)*
;
atom
: STRING
| ID
;
// these tokens denote the start of markup code (sets mmode to true)
OUTPUT_START : '${' {mmode=true;};
TAG_START : '<#' {mmode=true;};
TAG_END_START : '</' ('#' {mmode=true;} | ~'#' {$type=RAW;});
RAW : {!mmode}?=> . ;
// these tokens denote the end of markup code (sets mmode to false)
OUTPUT_END : '}' {mmode=false;};
TAG_END : '>' {mmode=false;};
// valid tokens only when in "markup mode"
EQUALS : '==';
IF : 'if';
STRING : '"' ~'"'* '"';
ID : ('a'..'z' | 'A'..'Z')+;
SPACE : (' ' | '\t' | '\r' | '\n')+ {skip();};
I've been working on a parser for some template language embeded in HTML (FreeMarker), piece of example here:
${abc}
<html>
<head>
<title>Welcome!</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>
Welcome ${user}<#if user == "Big Joe">, our beloved
leader</#if>!
</h1>
<p>Our latest product:
<a href="${latestProduct}">${latestProduct}</a>!
</body>
</html>
The template language is between some specific tags, e.g. '${' '}', '<#' '>'. Other raw texts in between can be treated like as the same tokens (RAW).
The key point here is that the same text, e.g. an integer, will mean differently thing for the parser depends on whether it's between those tags or not, and thus needs to be treated as different tokens.
I've tried with the following ugly implementation, with a self-defined state to indicate whether it's in those tags. As you see, I have to check the state almost in every rule, which drives me crazy...
I also thinked about the following two solutions:
Use multiple lexers. I can switch between two lexers when inside/outside those tags. However, the document for this is poor for ANTLR3. I don't know how to let one parser share two different lexers and switch between them.
Move the RAW rule up, after the NUMERICAL_ESCAPE rule. Check the state there, if it's in the tag, put back the token and continue trying the left rules. This would save lots of state checking. However, I don't find any 'put back' function and ANTLR complains about some rules can never be matched...
Is there an elegant solution for this?
grammar freemarker_simple;
@lexer::members {
int freemarker_type = 0;
}
expression
: primary_expression ;
primary_expression
: number_literal | identifier | parenthesis | builtin_variable
;
parenthesis
: OPEN_PAREN expression CLOSE_PAREN ;
number_literal
: INTEGER | DECIMAL
;
identifier
: ID
;
builtin_variable
: DOT ID
;
string_output
: OUTPUT_ESCAPE expression CLOSE_BRACE
;
numerical_output
: NUMERICAL_ESCAPE expression CLOSE_BRACE
;
if_expression
: START_TAG IF expression DIRECTIVE_END optional_block
( START_TAG ELSE_IF expression loose_directive_end optional_block )*
( END_TAG ELSE optional_block )?
END_TAG END_IF
;
list : START_TAG LIST expression AS ID DIRECTIVE_END optional_block END_TAG END_LIST ;
for_each
: START_TAG FOREACH ID IN expression DIRECTIVE_END optional_block END_TAG END_FOREACH ;
loose_directive_end
: ( DIRECTIVE_END | EMPTY_DIRECTIVE_END ) ;
freemarker_directive
: ( if_expression | list | for_each ) ;
content : ( RAW | string_output | numerical_output | freemarker_directive ) + ;
optional_block
: ( content )? ;
root : optional_block EOF ;
START_TAG
: '<#'
{ freemarker_type = 1; }
;
END_TAG : '</#'
{ freemarker_type = 1; }
;
DIRECTIVE_END
: '>'
{
if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW;
freemarker_type = 0;
}
;
EMPTY_DIRECTIVE_END
: '/>'
{
if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW;
freemarker_type = 0;
}
;
OUTPUT_ESCAPE
: '${'
{ if(freemarker_type == 0) freemarker_type = 2; }
;
NUMERICAL_ESCAPE
: '#{'
{ if(freemarker_type == 0) freemarker_type = 2; }
;
IF : 'if'
{ if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; }
;
ELSE : 'else' DIRECTIVE_END
{ if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; }
;
ELSE_IF : 'elseif'
{ if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; }
;
LIST : 'list'
{ if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; }
;
FOREACH : 'foreach'
{ if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; }
;
END_IF : 'if' DIRECTIVE_END
{ if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; }
;
END_LIST
: 'list' DIRECTIVE_END
{ if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; }
;
END_FOREACH
: 'foreach' DIRECTIVE_END
{ if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; }
;
FALSE: 'false' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
TRUE: 'true' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
INTEGER: ('0'..'9')+ { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
DECIMAL: INTEGER '.' INTEGER { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
DOT: '.' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
DOT_DOT: '..' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
PLUS: '+' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
MINUS: '-' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
TIMES: '*' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
DIVIDE: '/' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
PERCENT: '%' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
AND: '&' | '&&' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
OR: '|' | '||' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
EXCLAM: '!' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
OPEN_PAREN: '(' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
CLOSE_PAREN: ')' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
OPEN_BRACE
: '{'
{ if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; }
;
CLOSE_BRACE
: '}'
{
if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW;
if(freemarker_type == 2) freemarker_type = 0;
}
;
IN: 'in' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
AS: 'as' { if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; };
ID : ('A'..'Z'|'a'..'z')+
//{ if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW; }
;
BLANK : ( '\r' | ' ' | '\n' | '\t' )+
{
if(freemarker_type == 0) $type=RAW;
else $channel = HIDDEN;
}
;
RAW
: .
;
EDIT
I found the problem similar to How do I lex this input? , where a "start condition" is needed. But unfortunately, the answer uses a lot of predicates as well, just like my states.
Now, I tried to move the RAW higher with a predicate. Hoping to eliminate all the state checks after RAW rule. However, my example input failed, the first line end is recogonized as BLANK instead of RAW it should be.
I guess something wrong is about the rule priority:
After CLOSE_BRACE is matched, the next token is matched from rules after the CLOSE_BRACE rule, rather than start from the begenning again.
Any way to resolve this?
New grammar below with some debug outputs:
grammar freemarker_simple;
@lexer::members {
int freemarker_type = 0;
}
expression
: primary_expression ;
primary_expression
: number_literal | identifier | parenthesis | builtin_variable
;
parenthesis
: OPEN_PAREN expression CLOSE_PAREN ;
number_literal
: INTEGER | DECIMAL
;
identifier
: ID
;
builtin_variable
: DOT ID
;
string_output
: OUTPUT_ESCAPE expression CLOSE_BRACE
;
numerical_output
: NUMERICAL_ESCAPE expression CLOSE_BRACE
;
if_expression
: START_TAG IF expression DIRECTIVE_END optional_block
( START_TAG ELSE_IF expression loose_directive_end optional_block )*
( END_TAG ELSE optional_block )?
END_TAG END_IF
;
list : START_TAG LIST expression AS ID DIRECTIVE_END optional_block END_TAG END_LIST ;
for_each
: START_TAG FOREACH ID IN expression DIRECTIVE_END optional_block END_TAG END_FOREACH ;
loose_directive_end
: ( DIRECTIVE_END | EMPTY_DIRECTIVE_END ) ;
freemarker_directive
: ( if_expression | list | for_each ) ;
content : ( RAW | string_output | numerical_output | freemarker_directive ) + ;
optional_block
: ( content )? ;
root : optional_block EOF ;
START_TAG
: '<#'
{ freemarker_type = 1; }
;
END_TAG : '</#'
{ freemarker_type = 1; }
;
OUTPUT_ESCAPE
: '${'
{ if(freemarker_type == 0) freemarker_type = 2; }
;
NUMERICAL_ESCAPE
: '#{'
{ if(freemarker_type == 0) freemarker_type = 2; }
;
RAW
:
{ freemarker_type == 0 }?=> .
{System.out.printf("RAW \%s \%d\n",getText(),freemarker_type);}
;
DIRECTIVE_END
: '>'
{ if(freemarker_type == 1) freemarker_type = 0; }
;
EMPTY_DIRECTIVE_END
: '/>'
{ if(freemarker_type == 1) freemarker_type = 0; }
;
IF : 'if'
;
ELSE : 'else' DIRECTIVE_END
;
ELSE_IF : 'elseif'
;
LIST : 'list'
;
FOREACH : 'foreach'
;
END_IF : 'if' DIRECTIVE_END
;
END_LIST
: 'list' DIRECTIVE_END
;
END_FOREACH
: 'foreach' DIRECTIVE_END
;
FALSE: 'false' ;
TRUE: 'true' ;
INTEGER: ('0'..'9')+ ;
DECIMAL: INTEGER '.' INTEGER ;
DOT: '.' ;
DOT_DOT: '..' ;
PLUS: '+' ;
MINUS: '-' ;
TIMES: '*' ;
DIVIDE: '/' ;
PERCENT: '%' ;
AND: '&' | '&&' ;
OR: '|' | '||' ;
EXCLAM: '!' ;
OPEN_PAREN: '(' ;
CLOSE_PAREN: ')' ;
OPEN_BRACE
: '{'
;
CLOSE_BRACE
: '}'
{ if(freemarker_type == 2) {freemarker_type = 0;} }
;
IN: 'in' ;
AS: 'as' ;
ID : ('A'..'Z'|'a'..'z')+
{ System.out.printf("ID \%s \%d\n",getText(),freemarker_type);}
;
BLANK : ( '\r' | ' ' | '\n' | '\t' )+
{
System.out.printf("BLANK \%d\n",freemarker_type);
$channel = HIDDEN;
}
;
My input results with the output:
ID abc 2
BLANK 0 <<< incorrect, should be RAW when state==0
RAW < 0 <<< correct
ID html 0 <<< incorrect, should be RAW RAW RAW RAW
RAW > 0
EDIT2
Also tried the 2nd approach with Bart's grammar, still didn't work the 'html' is recognized as an ID, which should be 4 RAWs. When mmode=false, shouldn't RAW get matched first? Or the lexer still chooses the longest match here?
grammar freemarker_bart;
options {
output=AST;
ASTLabelType=CommonTree;
}
tokens {
FILE;
OUTPUT;
RAW_BLOCK;
}
@parser::members {
// merge a given list of tokens into a single AST
private CommonTree merge(List tokenList) {
StringBuilder b = new StringBuilder();
for(int i = 0; i < tokenList.size(); i++) {
Token token = (Token)tokenList.get(i);
b.append(token.getText());
}
return new CommonTree(new CommonToken(RAW, b.toString()));
}
}
@lexer::members {
private boolean mmode = false;
}
parse
: content* EOF -> ^(FILE content*)
;
content
: (options {greedy=true;}: t+=RAW)+ -> ^(RAW_BLOCK {merge($t)})
| if_stat
| output
;
if_stat
: TAG_START IF expression TAG_END raw_block TAG_END_START IF TAG_END -> ^(IF expression raw_block)
;
output
: OUTPUT_START expression OUTPUT_END -> ^(OUTPUT expression)
;
raw_block
: (t+=RAW)* -> ^(RAW_BLOCK {merge($t)})
;
expression
: eq_expression
;
eq_expression
: atom (EQUALS^ atom)*
;
atom
: STRING
| ID
;
// these tokens denote the start of markup code (sets mmode to true)
OUTPUT_START : '${' {mmode=true;};
TAG_START : '<#' {mmode=true;};
TAG_END_START : '</' ('#' {mmode=true;} | ~'#' {$type=RAW;});
RAW : {!mmode}?=> . ;
// these tokens denote the end of markup code (sets mmode to false)
OUTPUT_END : '}' {mmode=false;};
TAG_END : '>' {mmode=false;};
// valid tokens only when in "markup mode"
EQUALS : '==';
IF : 'if';
STRING : '"' ~'"'* '"';
ID : ('a'..'z' | 'A'..'Z')+;
SPACE : (' ' | '\t' | '\r' | '\n')+ {skip();};
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(1)
您可以使用门控语义谓词<来让词法分析器规则匹配< /a> 在其中测试某个布尔表达式。
一个小演示:
freemarker_simple.g
它将您的输入:
test.html
解析为以下 AST:
>可以用类来测试自己:
Main.java
编辑1
当我使用从您发布的第二个语法生成的解析器运行您的示例输入时,以下是打印到控制台的前 5 行(不包括许多警告)生成):
编辑2
是的,这是正确的:在这种情况下 ANTLR 选择更长的匹配。
但现在我(终于:))明白了您想要做什么,这是最后一个建议:您可以让
RAW
规则匹配字符,只要该规则看不到其中之一前面有以下字符序列:"<#"
、" 或
"${"
。请注意,该规则仍必须保留在语法的末尾。此检查在词法分析器内部执行。另外,在这种情况下,您不需要解析器中的merge(...)
方法:上面的语法将从本答案开头发布的输入生成以下 AST:
You could let lexer rules match using gated semantic predicates where you test for a certain boolean expression.
A little demo:
freemarker_simple.g
which parses your input:
test.html
into the following AST:
as you can test yourself with the class:
Main.java
EDIT 1
When I run your example input with a parser generated from the second grammar you posted, the following are wthe first 5 lines being printed to the console (not counting the many warnings that are generated):
EDIT 2
Yes, that is correct: ANTLR chooses the longer match in that case.
But now that I (finally :)) see what you're trying to do, here's a last proposal: you could let the
RAW
rule match characters as long as the rule can't see one of the following character sequences ahead:"<#"
,"</#"
or"${"
. Note that the rule must still stay at the end in the grammar. This check is performed inside the lexer. Also, in that case you don't need themerge(...)
method in the parser:The grammar above will produce the following AST from the input posted at the start of this answer: