用于协调的 SQL 语句

发布于 2024-12-11 00:15:14 字数 1396 浏览 0 评论 0原文

给定以下架构:

create table TBL1 (ID varchar2(100) primary key not null, MATCH_CRITERIA varchar2(100));
create table TBL2 (ID varchar2(100) primary key not null, MATCH_CRITERIA varchar2(100));
create table TBL_RESULT (ID varchar2(100) primary key not null, TBL1_ID varchar2(100), TBL2_ID varchar2(100));

create unique index UK_TBL_RESULT_TBL1_ID on TBL_RESULT(TBL1_ID);
create unique index UK_TBL_RESULT_TBL2_ID on TBL_RESULT(TBL2_ID);

create sequence SEQ_TBL_RESULT;

insert into TBL1 VALUES('1', '1');
insert into TBL1 VALUES('2', '1');
insert into TBL1 VALUES('3', '1');

insert into TBL2 VALUES('4', '1');
insert into TBL2 VALUES('5', '1');
insert into TBL2 VALUES('6', '1');

我需要一个 SQL 语句,该语句将通过协调 TBL1 和 TBL2 中的相等 MATCH_CRITERIA 来生成结果。

如果不存在 UNIQUE 约束,则以下内容将起作用。然而,我们的应用程序中需要独特的约束。

insert into TBL_RESULT (ID, TBL1_ID, TBL2_ID)
select SEQ_TBL_RESULT.nextval, TBL1.ID, TBL2.ID
from TBl1, TBL2
where TBL1.MATCH_CRITERIA = TBL2.MATCH_CRITERIA;

TBL_RESULT 的输出示例

| ID  |  TBL1_ID | TBL2_ID |
| '1' |  '1'     |    '5'  |
| '2' |  '2'     |    '4'  |
| '3' |  '3'     |    '6'  |

注意:“1”与“4”或“6”匹配并不重要。只要两个表中的 MATCH_CRITERIA 相等并且生成的表具有唯一的 TBL1_ID 和 TBL2_ID。

请注意,我们从 TBL1 插入一百万条记录,从 TBL2 插入另外一百万条记录。因此,使用 PL/SQL 的顺序插入是不可接受的,除非它运行得非常快(少于 15 分钟)。

Given the schema below:

create table TBL1 (ID varchar2(100) primary key not null, MATCH_CRITERIA varchar2(100));
create table TBL2 (ID varchar2(100) primary key not null, MATCH_CRITERIA varchar2(100));
create table TBL_RESULT (ID varchar2(100) primary key not null, TBL1_ID varchar2(100), TBL2_ID varchar2(100));

create unique index UK_TBL_RESULT_TBL1_ID on TBL_RESULT(TBL1_ID);
create unique index UK_TBL_RESULT_TBL2_ID on TBL_RESULT(TBL2_ID);

create sequence SEQ_TBL_RESULT;

insert into TBL1 VALUES('1', '1');
insert into TBL1 VALUES('2', '1');
insert into TBL1 VALUES('3', '1');

insert into TBL2 VALUES('4', '1');
insert into TBL2 VALUES('5', '1');
insert into TBL2 VALUES('6', '1');

I need an SQL statement that will produce the result by reconciling equal MATCH_CRITERIA from TBL1 and TBL2.

The following would work given that the UNIQUE constraint is not present. However, we need the unique constraints in our application.

insert into TBL_RESULT (ID, TBL1_ID, TBL2_ID)
select SEQ_TBL_RESULT.nextval, TBL1.ID, TBL2.ID
from TBl1, TBL2
where TBL1.MATCH_CRITERIA = TBL2.MATCH_CRITERIA;

Example output of TBL_RESULT

| ID  |  TBL1_ID | TBL2_ID |
| '1' |  '1'     |    '5'  |
| '2' |  '2'     |    '4'  |
| '3' |  '3'     |    '6'  |

Note: it doesn't matter if '1' is matched with '4' or '6'. As long as the MATCH_CRITERIA from both tables are equal and the resulting table has unique TBL1_ID and TBL2_ID.

Note that we are inserting a million records from TBL1 and another million records from TBL2. Thus, sequential insert using PL/SQL is not acceptable unless it can run really fast (less than 15 minutes).

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(2

只为守护你 2024-12-18 00:15:14

怎么样:

  INSERT INTO TBL_RESULT (ID, TBL1_ID, TBL2_ID) 
  SELECT seq_tbl_result.nextval,t1.id,t2.id 
  FROM
  (SELECT t1.match_criteria,t1.id, row_number() OVER (PARTITION BY t1.match_criteria ORDER BY t1.id) rn 
   FROM tbl1 t1) t1,  
  (SELECT t2.match_criteria,t2.id, row_number() OVER (PARTITION BY t2.match_criteria ORDER BY t2.id) rn 
   FROM tbl2 t2) t2
  WHERE t1.match_criteria=t2.match_criteria AND t1.rn=t2.rn

注意:它假设两个表中每个匹配集中的行数相等。

how about this:

  INSERT INTO TBL_RESULT (ID, TBL1_ID, TBL2_ID) 
  SELECT seq_tbl_result.nextval,t1.id,t2.id 
  FROM
  (SELECT t1.match_criteria,t1.id, row_number() OVER (PARTITION BY t1.match_criteria ORDER BY t1.id) rn 
   FROM tbl1 t1) t1,  
  (SELECT t2.match_criteria,t2.id, row_number() OVER (PARTITION BY t2.match_criteria ORDER BY t2.id) rn 
   FROM tbl2 t2) t2
  WHERE t1.match_criteria=t2.match_criteria AND t1.rn=t2.rn

Note: It assumes that there are an equal number of rows in each matching set in both tables.

时光沙漏 2024-12-18 00:15:14

像这样的事情怎么样:

insert into TBL_RESULT (ID, TBL1_ID, TBL2_ID)
select SEQ_TBL_RESULT.nextval, TBL1.ID, TBL2.ID 
from TBl1, TBL2
where TBL1.MATCH_CRITERIA = TBL2.MATCH_CRITERIA
AND (NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM TBL_RESULT WHERE TBL1_ID = TBL1.ID) OR NOT EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM TBL_RESULT WHERE TBL2_ID = TBL2.id))

这应该可以防止违反您的独特约束。

What about something like this:

insert into TBL_RESULT (ID, TBL1_ID, TBL2_ID)
select SEQ_TBL_RESULT.nextval, TBL1.ID, TBL2.ID 
from TBl1, TBL2
where TBL1.MATCH_CRITERIA = TBL2.MATCH_CRITERIA
AND (NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM TBL_RESULT WHERE TBL1_ID = TBL1.ID) OR NOT EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM TBL_RESULT WHERE TBL2_ID = TBL2.id))

This should prevent violation of your unique constraints.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文