GCJ 还在开发中吗？
我一直在寻找有关 GCJ 的状况及其未来的信息，但特别是关于未来的信息却一无所获……
GCJ 死了吗？
I've been searching for information about the state of GCJ and it's future but especially for the future was nothing to find...
Is GCJ dead?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（2）
2016 年更新：是的，根据这篇博文，它已经正式死亡。< /strong>
原帖：
我没有找到任何官方消息来源这么说，但有几个地方（例如 此处）指出它处于维护模式。此外，自 2009 年以来就没有任何新闻更新，自 2007 年以来也没有定期更新……相反，邮件列表仍然活跃，并且仍然存在有关它的讨论。
所以我想我最好的猜测是“ish”，它肯定没有看到大量的活动，但似乎正在发生一些小事情。我不会指望未来会出现任何突然的活动高峰，但除非发生重大变化，否则我的猜测是它正在逐渐结束。
顺便说一句，我认为它的必要性已经有所减弱。以前，我知道很多人都想本地编译 Java 程序而不是字节码，但现在人们似乎已经意识到这几乎总是一个坏主意:-)
2016 Update: Yes, it's officially dead, as per this blog post.
Original post:
I haven't found any official sources saying so, but several places (such as here) point to it being in maintenance mode. Add that to the fact there's been no news updates since 2009, and no regular ones since 2007... on the contrary, the mailing list is still active and there's still talk around it.
So I guess my best guess would be "ish", it's certainly not seeing hives of activity but something minor appears to be going on. I wouldn't rely on there being any sudden rush of activity in the future though unless something drastic changes, my guess is it's winding down.
On a side note, I think its perceived necessity has diminished somewhat. Back in the day I knew of lots of people all wanting to compile Java programs natively rather than to bytecode, but now people seem to have realised that's almost always a bad idea :-)
他们的邮件列表看起来足够活跃——有可能在没有官方公告的情况下就已经对其进行了工作。也就是说，GCC 发行说明中提到的对 Java 前端的最后一次重大更改是针对 GCC 4.3 的。
Their mailing lists look active enough – it's possible work is being done to it without there being official announcements. That said, the last nontrivial changes to the Java frontend mentioned in GCC release notes were for GCC 4.3.