Appstore会接受这种应用吗?

发布于 12-10 01:28 字数 479 浏览 2 评论 0原文

所以我已经在应用程序商店上发布了 2 个版本。

其中一个应用程序是免费但有限的版本。

另一种是付费无限的。基本布局..

我收到了一些想要购买该应用程序并提供给员工的公司的疑问。因此,他们不必使用个人帐户购买该应用程序。

因此,我正在考虑发布第三个版本,该版本会在首次启动时提示用户输入许可证密钥,如果密钥有效,则应用程序将启动并工作,直到重新安装或我们。如果密钥无效,应用程序只会不断提示输入有效许可证。

现在我记得在某处读到苹果不允许应用程序没有公共功能或类似的东西。除非你有有效的许可证,否则这个应用程序不会有这个。 但由于我确实还提供了该应用程序的有效公共版本,那么这个版本会被接受吗?或者他们取消了这些规则?

对此事的任何见解都会有所帮助!

编辑:

忘了提及,我希望使用该许可证的原因是因为我有相同的 Android 应用程序,并且希望公司能够为两种设备类型购买,而不仅仅是苹果设备。

谢谢

So I already have 2 versions out on appstore..

One app is a free but limited version.

The other is a paid unlimited. The basic layout..

I have had questions from companies wanting to buy the app and give to their employees. So they don't have to buy the app with their personal accounts..

So I was thinking of releasing a 3rd version that prompts the user for a license key on first start, if the key is valid the app starts and works until reinstalled or w/e. If the key is invalid the app just keeps prompting for a valid license.

Now I remembered reading somewhere that apple wouldn't allow apps that had no public function or something like that. Which this app wont have unless u have a valid license..
But since I do also provide a valid public version of the app, will this one get accepted? Or have they removed theese rules?

Any insight in the matter would be helpful!

Edit:

Forgot to mention that the reason im looking to use the license is because i have the same app for android and want the companies to be able to buy for both device types, not just apple devices.

Thanks

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(7

青朷2024-12-17 01:28:33

我前段时间做了一些与此非常相似的事情,他们似乎对此表示同意(至少当时),他们只是在补充信息中要求提供许可证密钥(在应用程序提交期间)以完成所有通常的验证测试。

I did something very similar to this some time ago, they seemed ok with it (then at least), they just asked for a license key in the complementary info (during the app submission) to go through all their usual validation tests.

三五鸿雁2024-12-17 01:28:33

Klassmating 在应用商店中有一款应用,除非您是特定大学的学生,否则没有公共功能。所以看起来你可以拥有这样的应用程序。

Klassmating has an app in the app store that has no public functionality unless you are a student at a specific university. So it seems like you can have apps like that.

颜漓半夏2024-12-17 01:28:33

在不确切知道的情况下,我认为苹果会拒绝商店中的此类应用程序(主要是因为它允许您“在他们背后”出售应用程序 - 即出售许可证密钥而不是使用应用程序内购买):-)

但是,有我想到了两种可能的解决方案来解决您的问题:

  1. 创建并分发礼品代码(如果您必须给出太多礼品代码,这将是一个问题)。

  2. 向公司临时分发您的应用程序。基本上,他们需要您的应用程序包和临时移动配置文件。然后,他们只需将您的应用程序拖到 iTunes 即可安装。

Without knowing exactly, I would assume Apple would reject such an app from the store (mainly because it would allow you to sell applications "behind their back" - i.e. sell licence keys and not using in-app purchase) :-)

However, there are two possible solutions to your problem that come to my mind:

  1. Create and distribute gift codes (would be a problem if you had to give out too many of them).

  2. Do an ad-hoc distribution of your app to the companies. Basically they would need your application bundle and an ad-hoc mobile provision file. Then they can simply install your application by dragging it to iTunes.

你的往事2024-12-17 01:28:33

有不同的官方 iPhone 应用程序分发方法。

对于您当前的要求,我假设您可以使用自定义 B2B 应用程序,您可以在其中直接向拥有批量购买计划帐户的企业客户交付应用程序。您可以从上面提供的链接获取更多信息。

干杯!

There are different official iPhone application distribution methods.

In which for your current requirement,I suppose you can use the Custom B2B Apps,where you can deliver apps directly to your business customers who have a Volume Purchase Program account.You can get more information from the link provided above.

cheers!

电影里的梦2024-12-17 01:28:33

是的,我在应用程序商店里也有一个像这样工作的应用程序。您必须向他们提供访问应用程序功能的密钥/许可证,以便他们可以对其进行全面测试。

Yes, I too have had an app in the app store which works like this. You have to provide them with a key/licence to access the app functionality so they can test it fully.

往事随风而去2024-12-17 01:28:33

我有一个应用程序因为这个原因被拒绝 - 需要用户名和密码,而不是许可证密钥,但是免费的。他们表示,这违反了有关应用内购买的许可条款。
我的允许在应用程序内进行有限时间的免费试用,但完整功能仅限于在应用程序外部购买。苹果希望削减 30% 的订阅费用,所以这对我们来说不是一个赌注。

另一方面,应用程序商店的审核过程似乎完全是随机的,所以谁知道呢。

I've had an app rejected for this very reason - required a username and password, not a licence key, but was free. They said in contravened the licence terms regarding in app purchases.
Mine allowed time limited free trials from within the app, but full functionality was restricted to purchases outside the app. Apple wanted their 30% cut of the subscription cost so it was no dice for us.

On the other hand, the app store review process is seemingly entirely random, so who knows.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文