寻找最佳组合的算法

发布于 2024-12-08 12:26:50 字数 1971 浏览 3 评论 0原文

因此,我有 12 个列表,每个列表包含 28 个具有值的项目。

我试图通过与其他 11 个列表交换项目来最大化第一个列表的价值。

我还可以交易不同数量的物品。例如,我可以交易列表 1 中的 6 个项目和列表 2 中的 3 个项目。或者,我可以交易列表 1 中的 19 个项目和列表 2 中的 22 个项目。大型池中还有不属于列表的其他项目,因此,如果列表接收的项目超过 28 个,则可以轻松删除最低值,如果列表的项目少于 28 个,则可以轻松添加新项目。

然而,一个限制是我一次只能使用一张列表进行交易。例如,我不能将列表1中的3个项目交易到列表2,将列表2中的3个项目交易到列表3,以及将列表3中的3个项目交易到列表1。当我从列表1进行交易时,我只能一次与一个其他列表进行交易。

显然我可以用蛮力来实现这一点,但我觉得这需要很长时间。我不太擅长组合,所以我不确定如果我想要暴力破解会有多少种不同的组合。

所以我的问题是,暴力破解在这里是否是一个可行的解决方案,如果不是,有什么算法的例子可以帮助我?

谢谢,克日斯。

编辑:

示例:

List 1
[Apple - 12]
[Banana - 5]
[Orange - 8]

List 2
[Steak - 15]
[Chicken - 2]
[Fish - 7]

List 3
[Zebra - 20]
[Horse - 6]
[Elephant - 10]

所以我将从列表 1 开始。这就是程序要做的事情:

if (List1.Apple - List2.Steak < BestTradeAvailable) Then BestTradeAvailable = List1.Apple - List2.Steak
if (list1.Apple - List2.Chicken < BestTradeAvailable) Then BestTradeAvailable = list1.Apple - List2.Chicken
if (list1.Apple - list2.Fish < BestTradeAvailable) Then BestTradeAvailable = list1.Apple - list2.Fish
if (list1.Banana - List2.Steak < BestTradeAvailable) Then BestTradeAvailable = list1.Banana - List2.Steak
if (list1.Banana - List2.Chicken < BestTradeAvailable) Then BestTradeAvailable = list1.Banana - List2.Chicken
if (list1.Banana - List2.Fish < BestTradeAvailable) Then BestTradeAvailable = list1.Banana - List2.Fish

等等 我也想一次处理多个项目,因此:

if (list1.Apple + list1.Banana - List2.Steak + List2.Chicken < BestTradeAvailable) Then BestTradeAvailable = list1.Apple + list1.Banana - List2.Steak + List2.Chicken

但正如我之前所说,您可以交易列表 1 中的一项和列表 2 中的 2 项:

if (list1.Apple - List2.Steak + List2.Chicken < BestTradeAvailable) Then BestTradeAvailable = List1.Apple - List2.Steak + List2.Chicken

所以基本上,我只想尝试找到可用的最佳交易。

在此示例中,最佳交易是将 Apple + Orange 交易到 List3 换取 Zebra 和 Elephant,因为此交易使 List1 的总价值增加了​​最高金额。

So, I have 12 lists and each of them contain 28 items with a value.

I am trying to maximize the value of the first list by switching items with the other 11 lists.

I can also trade different amounts of items. For example, I can trade 6 items from list 1 and 3 items from list 2. Or, I can trade 19 items from list 1 and 22 items from list 2. There are other items in a large pool that are not part of a list, so if a list receives more than 28 items the lowest values can easily be dropped, and if a list has less than 28 items then new items can easily be added.

However, one restriction is that I can only trade with one list at a time. For example, I can't trade 3 items from list 1 to list 2, trade 3 items from list 2 to list 3, and trade 3 items from list 3 to list 1. When I'm trading from list one, I can only trade with one single other list at a time.

I can obviously brute force this, but I feel like that would take forever. I'm not great with combinations, so I'm not exactly sure how many different combinations there would be if I wanted to brute force.

So my questions are, is brute forcing a feasible solution here, and if not, what's an example of an algorithm that could help me?

Thanks, Krzys.

EDIT:

Example:

List 1
[Apple - 12]
[Banana - 5]
[Orange - 8]

List 2
[Steak - 15]
[Chicken - 2]
[Fish - 7]

List 3
[Zebra - 20]
[Horse - 6]
[Elephant - 10]

So I'll start with list 1. This is what the program would do:

if (List1.Apple - List2.Steak < BestTradeAvailable) Then BestTradeAvailable = List1.Apple - List2.Steak
if (list1.Apple - List2.Chicken < BestTradeAvailable) Then BestTradeAvailable = list1.Apple - List2.Chicken
if (list1.Apple - list2.Fish < BestTradeAvailable) Then BestTradeAvailable = list1.Apple - list2.Fish
if (list1.Banana - List2.Steak < BestTradeAvailable) Then BestTradeAvailable = list1.Banana - List2.Steak
if (list1.Banana - List2.Chicken < BestTradeAvailable) Then BestTradeAvailable = list1.Banana - List2.Chicken
if (list1.Banana - List2.Fish < BestTradeAvailable) Then BestTradeAvailable = list1.Banana - List2.Fish

etc
I also want to do multiple items at a time so:

if (list1.Apple + list1.Banana - List2.Steak + List2.Chicken < BestTradeAvailable) Then BestTradeAvailable = list1.Apple + list1.Banana - List2.Steak + List2.Chicken

But as I said before, you could trade one item from list 1 and 2 items from list 2:

if (list1.Apple - List2.Steak + List2.Chicken < BestTradeAvailable) Then BestTradeAvailable = List1.Apple - List2.Steak + List2.Chicken

So basically, I just want to try find the best trade available.

In this example, the best trade would be trading Apple + Orange to List3 for Zebra and Elephant, because this trade increase List1's total value by the highest amount.

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(2

抱猫软卧 2024-12-15 12:26:50

本质上您需要对列表进行排序并取出前 28 个?

优先队列会起作用。

Essentially you need to sort the lists and take the top 28?

Priority queues would work.

我很OK 2024-12-15 12:26:50

暴力解决方案仅需要 O(n^2 * (m-1)) 时间复杂度,其中 n 是列表中的项目数,m 是列表数。如果你想查找所有组合,时间复杂度为 O(n^2 * (n-1) * (m-1)),你只需尝试 232848 个组合。或者所有组合都是n!如果顺序也很重要。

A brute force solution would take only O(n^2 * (m-1)) time complexity where n is the number of items in the list and m is the number of lists. If you want to look for all combinations it would be O(n^2 * (n-1) * (m-1)) time complexity that would only be 232848 combinations you have to try. Or all combinations is n! if the order is important, too.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文