Paypal 与 Worldpay

发布于 2024-12-07 22:19:43 字数 323 浏览 0 评论 0原文

我们正在使用Paypal Pro的托管解决方案进行付款,发现当客户进入付款页面时,很多订单没有完成(一位客户抱怨他们只能选择澳大利亚和美国作为运送国家!),我们已经发现 Paypal 的服务存在很多不一致之处,25% 的订单未完成。

Worldpay 似乎是不错的选择,有人有 Worldpay 和 Paypal 的经验吗?Worldpay 更可靠吗?

Worldpay 的文档好吗? Paypal 太可怕了。

还有其他选择吗?

我们试图通过将 IMA 和网关合二为一,每月处理大约 3000 至 4000 英镑的付款来保持简单。

we are using Paypal Pro's Hosted solution for payments and finding that a lot of orders aren't completed when customers go to the payment page (one customer complained that they could only select Australia and United States for the shipping country!), we've found a lot of inconsistency with Paypal's service and 25% of orders aren't complete.

Worldpay seems like good alternative, does anyone have experience of both Worldpay and Paypal, is Worldpay more reliable?

Is Worldpay's documentation any good? Paypal's is terrible.

Are there any other alternatives?

We're trying to keep it simple by having the IMA and gateway all in one and process around £3k-£4k of payments a month.

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(2

素食主义者 2024-12-14 22:19:43

看看 Avangate - www.avangate.com

Take a look at Avangate - www.avangate.com

说好的呢 2024-12-14 22:19:43

这个问题已经有几个月了,但我还是会回答。

PayPal 的文档相当糟糕,但 WorldPay 也好不了多少。事实上,他们为尚不支持的内容提供了文档,有时很难确定这是您的代码还是服务不存在。这尤其适用于定期付款。

我们曾经使用 PayPal,但现在改用 WorldPay。我个人的看法是PayPal更灵活。 WorldPay 有其局限性 - 特别是如果您销售 SaaS 并需要一些真正的灵活性,并且随着事情对我们来说变得复杂,我们必须发挥创造力来使用它。

但归根结底,WorldPay 支持比 PayPal 好一百万倍。对我们来说,它们稍微便宜一些(今年有望变得更便宜,因为我们已经用它们做了一些量)。即使不是 100%,支持也会定期回复电子邮件。另外你可以打电话。他们甚至很乐意查看服务器日志,并告诉您丢失的原因或方式。

总结并回答您的问题:

  1. 在文档上 - 它们几乎与 PayPal 相同。
  2. 在服务方面,他们要好得多。
  3. 在价格上,他们最终会变得更好,并且在资金到达您的账户之前只保留 48 小时(这是可以协商的,顺便说一句)。
  4. 根据您的需要,还有其他可用选项。如果您希望定期付款并且您的 IMA 和 PSP 来自同一来源,WorldPay 是一个不错的选择,特别是如果您位于英国。
  5. 如果 IMA 和 PSP 相同并不重要,我建议查看 SagePay(英国)和 Authorize.net(美国) - 恕我直言,它们都非常好。不过,SagePay 有其局限性,特别是如果您想要定期计费。

请注意,以上内容基于我销售定制、基于订阅的 SaaS(而非在线商店)的经验。

This question is a few months old, but I'll answer it anyway.

PayPal's documentation is quite bad, but WorldPay isn't much better. In fact, they have documentation in place for somethings they don't yet support, and it can be difficult at times to figure out whether it's your code or that the service does not exist. This applies, in particular, to recurring payments.

We used to have PayPal, but we switched to WorldPay. My personal view is that PayPal is more flexible. WorldPay has its limitations - especially if you are selling SaaS and need some real flexibility, and as things get complicated for us, we have to get creative to work with it.

But at the end of the day, WorldPay support is a million times better than PayPal. For us, they are slightly cheaper (and will become cheaper this year hopefully as we have done some volume with them). Support responds to emails pretty regularly if not a 100%. Plus you can call. They're even happy to look at server logs and tell you why or how something got lost if it got lost.

To sum up and answer your question:

  1. On Documentation - they are almost the same as PayPal.
  2. On service, they are MUCH, MUCH better.
  3. On price, they will eventually get better and hold money for only 48 hours before it hits your account (this is negotiable, btw).
  4. Depending on what you want, there are other options available. If you want recurring payments and your IMA and PSP to come from one source, WorldPay is a good alternative, especially if you are based in the UK.
  5. If IMA and PSP being the same is not important, I suggest checking out SagePay (UK) and Authorize.net (US) - IMHO they are both quite good. SagePay has its limitations, though, especially if you want recurring billing.

Please note, the above is based on my experience of selling customized, subscription based SaaS, not an online store.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文