N2CMS的优点和缺点

发布于 2024-12-07 14:58:21 字数 246 浏览 4 评论 0原文

我目前正在收集有关 .Net(免费/开源)可用的各种 CMS 选项的知识。

我遇到了 DotNetNukeN2CMS

刚刚浏览了 n2cms 的源代码,发现它非常有用。

即使我认为我对缺点也不太了解。

如果你们中有人曾在 n2cms 上工作过,并且可以让我知道其缺点以及任何其他可用的开源 CMS 选项,请告诉我。

谢谢!

I am currently gathering knowledge on various CMS option's available for .Net(free/open-source).

I came across DotNetNuke and N2CMS.

Was just wandering thru the source code of n2cms and found it quiet useful.

Even thought i don't have much idea about the disadvantage's .

Please let me know, if any one of you have worked on n2cms and can let me know the disadvantage and any other OPEN SOURCE CMS option's available.

Thanks!

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(3

岁月如刀 2024-12-14 14:58:21

N2CMS 的缺点:

  • 它“感觉”不像企业级应用程序,感觉轻很多。这并不是说它不适合这个级别的比赛,但我认为它更多地说明了巧妙的实现,隐藏了很多复杂性。请注意,N2CMS 不是一个 2+ 层应用程序,但看起来最近有一个分支正在探索从其他地方加载数据(例如从额外的层)。

  • 这带来了另一个缺点:它的文档还有很多不足之处。这是由于活跃社区较小且代码发展迅速。因此,如果您想充分利用超灵活的 N2CMS,则需要提前挖掘大量代码。还要注意的是,维护者(libardo)是一个非常快速的响应者,无论是技术援助还是错误修复!

  • 只有 4 个表才会持久化(如果仍然成立的话)。因此,“常规”数据库优化可能是不可能的。 Otoh,过早的优化是万恶之源,最重要的是,因为您正在处理 NHibernate,所以您可以在该级别上使用一些技巧。

  • 我担心,虽然 Orchard 还很小,但 Orchard(一个有点类似的 CMS)可能会赶上 N2CMS,因为它背后有一些吸引社区的大玩家。要么N2CMS必须走同样“商业”的路线,要么在某个时候被Orchard超越。创建一些 NuGet 包在这方面是非常好的一步!

我对 N2 的看法是,它是最适合开发人员的 CMS 之一。

Disadvantages of N2CMS:

  • It does not "feel" like an enterprise-level app, it feels a lot lighter. That's not to say it's not up for a match at that level, but I think it says more about the clever implementation which hides away a lot of the complexity. Note that N2CMS is not a 2+-tiered application, but it looks like there's a recent branch exploring the loading of data from other places (like from an extra tier).

  • This brings in another disadvantage: it's documentation leaves a lot to be desired. This is due to the small active community and the quickly evolving code. So you'll have a lot of code digging ahead if you want to take full advantage of the ultra-flexible N2CMS. Mind too that the maintainer (libardo) is a very quick responder, both for technical assistance as for bug fixing!

  • Persistence happens with only 4 tables (if that still holds). "Regular" DB optimization might therefore be impossible. Otoh, premature optimzation is the root of all evil, and on top of that, because you're dealing with NHibernate, you can pull some tricks on that level.

  • I'm afraid that while still small, Orchard - a somewhat comparable CMS - might catch up on N2CMS, because it has some large players behind it who attract community. Either N2CMS will have to walk an equally "commercial" route, or it is going to be surpassed by Orchard at some time. Having created some NuGet packages was a very good step in that regard!

My take on N2 is that it's one of the best CMS's around for developers.

夏日落 2024-12-14 14:58:21

考虑一下 Umbraco,它的架构肯定比 DNN 更好。 DNN 是来自地狱的可憎之物。大多数最终用户都非常讨厌它。

我喜欢 N2CMS,但它通常很难推销,因为它周围的社区并不是很大......

Consider Umbraco, its architecture is definitely better than DNN's. DNN is an abomination from hell. Most end users hate it with a passion.

I like N2CMS, but it's a often a hard sell because the community around it isn't really big...

云朵有点甜 2024-12-14 14:58:21

N2CMS 的优点:

  • 编辑用户体验/预览功能 - 我可以通过它的[前端]菜单导航站点,左侧的 cms 树将立即同步。或者,如果后端关闭,我有一个小工具栏,可以立即编辑页面或在我所在的位置打开后端。

对我来说,这也是 N2CMS 拥有而 Umbraco 所缺少的最重要的功能。

Advantage of N2CMS:

  • Editing User Experience / Preview Funtionallity - I can navigate the site via it's [frontend] menus, and the cms tree on the left will be synced instantly. Or if the backend is closed, i have a small toolbar that allows to edit the a page immediately or to open the backend right where i am.

This is for me also the most important feature N2CMS has and Umbraco is missing.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文