我可以使用代码契约来解决无法使用通用构造函数约束的问题吗？

发布于 2024-12-07 12:45:24 字数 850 浏览 0 评论 0原文

我正在编写一个类，该类将创建另一个类的不可变副本，而我这样做的方式要求该副本在构造函数中采用日期和原始实例。我知道您无法创建指定参数的构造函数约束，但是有没有办法使用代码契约来解决它？

public class Copier<o, c>
    where o : class, INotifyPropertyChanged
    where c : class, c // ideally new(datetime, o)
{
    private Dictionary<DateTime, c> copies;

    public Copier(o original)
    {
        this.copies = new Dictionary<DateTime, c>();
        original.PropertyChanged += 
            this.propertyChangedHandler(object sender, PropertyChangedEventArgs args);
    }

    private void propertyChangedHandler(object sender, PropertyChangedEventArgs args)
    {
        var original = sender as o;
        var now = DateTime.Now;
        this.copies.Add(now, new c(now, original)); // error here
    }
}

复制类是我创建的，继承自原始类，将所有属性覆盖为只读，并在构造函数中复制原始类的值。

注意：有一个要求（由我强加），原始对象不能被修改。

原文

I'm tying to write a class that will create immutable copies of another class, and the way I'm doing it requires that the copy takes a date and an instance of the original in the constructor. I know that you can't create a constructor constraint that specifies parameters, but is there a way to work around it using code contracts?

public class Copier<o, c>
    where o : class, INotifyPropertyChanged
    where c : class, c // ideally new(datetime, o)
{
    private Dictionary<DateTime, c> copies;

    public Copier(o original)
    {
        this.copies = new Dictionary<DateTime, c>();
        original.PropertyChanged += 
            this.propertyChangedHandler(object sender, PropertyChangedEventArgs args);
    }

    private void propertyChangedHandler(object sender, PropertyChangedEventArgs args)
    {
        var original = sender as o;
        var now = DateTime.Now;
        this.copies.Add(now, new c(now, original)); // error here
    }
}

The copy clases are created by me, inherit from the originals, override all of the properties to readonly and copy the values from the original in the constructor.

Note: There is a requirement (imposed by me) that the original objects cannot be modified.

分享到QQ

分享到微博

如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

发布评论

需要登录才能够评论，你可以免费注册一个本站的账号。

将军与妓 2024-12-14 12:45:24

按照建议，传递创建委托：

public class Copier<o, c>
    where o : class, INotifyPropertyChanged
    where c : class, c // ideally new(datetime, o)
{
private Dictionary<DateTime, c> copies;
private Func<o, DateTime, c> copyFunc;

public Copier(o original, Func<o, DateTime, c> copyFunc)
{
    this.copyFunc = copyFunc;
    this.copies = new Dictionary<DateTime, c>();
    original.PropertyChanged += 
        this.propertyChangedHandler(object sender, PropertyChangedEventArgs args);
}

private void propertyChangedHandler(object sender, PropertyChangedEventArgs args)
{
    var original = sender as o;
    var now = DateTime.Now;
    this.copies.Add(copyFunc(now, original)); 
}

}

As suggested, pass a creation delegate:

public class Copier<o, c>
    where o : class, INotifyPropertyChanged
    where c : class, c // ideally new(datetime, o)
{
private Dictionary<DateTime, c> copies;
private Func<o, DateTime, c> copyFunc;

public Copier(o original, Func<o, DateTime, c> copyFunc)
{
    this.copyFunc = copyFunc;
    this.copies = new Dictionary<DateTime, c>();
    original.PropertyChanged += 
        this.propertyChangedHandler(object sender, PropertyChangedEventArgs args);
}

private void propertyChangedHandler(object sender, PropertyChangedEventArgs args)
{
    var original = sender as o;
    var now = DateTime.Now;
    this.copies.Add(copyFunc(now, original)); 
}

}

回复收藏 0 原文

~没有更多了~