如何在Google图书中按出版日期的相反顺序对搜索结果进行排序？
Google 图书在左栏中提供了按日期排序选项，用于对搜索到的图书进行排序。但结果似乎是出版日期按降序排列（从最新到最旧）。如果有数千个搜索结果，这可能不适合查找最旧的。如何快速找到最旧的书（出版日期最旧）？ 提前致谢。
Google books provide sorted by date option on the left column to sort searched books. But the result seems that publication date is in descending order ( from latest to oldest). This may not be fit for finding the oldest if there are thousands of search results. How can I quickly locate the oldest book (publication date is the oldest)?
Thanks in advance.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（2）
目前没有简单的方法可以在 Google 图书中按日期升序排序。您可以通过选择“自定义范围”并尝试结束日期来解决此问题，直到只获得一页结果。不幸的是，您仍然可能会遇到这样的问题：Google 认为很久以前出版的许多书籍实际上是元数据错误。
There is currently no way simple way to sort by date in ascending order in Google Books. You can work around this by choosing "Custom Range" and trying out end dates until you get only 1 page of results. Unfortunately, you're still likely to run into the problem that many of the books that Google thinks were published a long time ago are actually metadata errors.
谷歌只是想强迫人们订阅。按日期排序是一项基本功能，应该已经可用。谷歌图书本质上是有缺陷的，谷歌出于商业原因保持这种方式。因此，一些档案馆开始再次将书籍本身数字化。尤其是带有印刷品的书籍比其他书籍更难找到。我每天都会研究印刷品并知道我在处理什么。 Hathitrust 是查找书籍或转到档案页面的解决方案，他们提供更好的服务。 Internetarchive 也是一个很好的解决方案。
几年前，谷歌发起了一项免费数字化世界各地图书的活动。他们向这些档案提供了数据库，但并不是在这些书籍中进行搜索的良好解决方案。所以基本上谷歌是在说，如果你想找到一些东西，你需要我们，我们会为此收费。我认为这是一种不道德的做事方式。这些书是人类的财产，而不是谷歌的财产。
Google is just trying to force people to get a subscription. Sorting things by date is a basic thing which should already be available. Google books is inherently flawed an Google keeps it this way for commercial reasons. Some archives are starting to digitize books themselves again because of this. Especially books with prints in them are harder to find than others. I do research in printed matter on a daily basis and know what I am dealing with. Hathitrust is a solution to find books, or go to the pages of the archives, they offer better service. Also The Internetarchive is a good solution.
Years ago Google started a campaign to digitize books from all over the world for free. They offered their database to these archives, but NOT a good solution to search within these books. So basically google is saying, if you want to find something, you'll need us and we will charge money for it. I consider this as an unethical way of doing things. These books are property of humankind and not of google.