I'd pass on Umbraco and C1 Composite, as they generally aren't user-friendly. I think Orchard is best, as it has the best feedback of them all. Umbraco is aimed more at developers who want to tweak a lot of things.
If you will go outside of .NET and IIS, Joomla is another popular CMS in LAMP. This can be hosted in either Unix or Win environments. There's a large community, lots of implementations and robust API for plugins. I run it on MAMP on my Mac, and it also runs on WAMPServer, for development.
Last year I created a membership style site in Joomla using Mighty Extensions for a bed and breakfast listing service (http://uurehome.com). Mighty User and Membership was enough, this adds custom user fields and subscription plans. You do have to pay for Mighty Extensions. Payment for the B&B listings is done thru Paypal, Mighty Membership enables this.
The subscription plan feature is Mighty Membership is very good. You can have length of time, cost renewals, renewal nag messages. Could have written myself, but why at this cost :-)
Joomla can certainly handle the community side of a non-profit site, there's the usual assortment of content, discussions, news feeds and so on. It's also ok for mere mortals to administer.
Not so sure about comparing to Orchard, as I haven't kicked the tires on Orchard. I have done enterprise web CMS for a living in the past, so I am used to evaluating these sorts of products. Orchard looks similar to Joomla in how it works, based on the screenshots I see in the docs. One thing I will say with confidence is that it's easier to standup Joomla (or something LAMP/WAMP/MAMP) than on the MS Webmatrix. However, if you already have a Webmatrix provider, then it's similar. Said by someone that has done a bunch of IIS and pretty much all the web technologies going back to the beginning of time (that's 1993).
Another aspect of using Joomla for me in this project, which is for a small business, was knowing that there's a bunch of Joomla knowledgable web design shops this owner could use if I stop helping her. While I am not going to say there isn't a base of folks doing web design that are doing Orchard, my sense is that its much smaller than Joomla. This is a factor for me in helping non-profits, churches and so on, not leaving them in a place where I am the "only" person that could keep whatever it is running. Still, if there's even a couple of local web design shops that do Orchard, I'd say that's enough to feel comfortable.
We built http://aclj.org on Orchard with a custom membership implementation within to support millions of members. We do form processing through Kimbia for donations and petition signatures. We're very happy with the implementation and feel that Orchard worked out well for us as a platform. It is VERY extensible and we developed 32 custom modules in-house.
For a non profit organization it is unlikely to maintain a costly server where LAMP stack has both low cost server and some decent CMS which meets your requirements perfectly. Some of them are :
Any of them are highly extensible, got a great community support , plenty of themes and modules readily available and you can get awesome things for free though there are some paid once too.
And if you want my recommendation i would go for Drupal as it provides :
Advantages: 1. More forum support. 2. Easy to learn. 3. Very less server cost to host the site. 4. You will have N number of plugins and widgets etc...
发布评论
评论（6）
我会放弃 Umbraco 和 C1 Composite，因为它们通常不方便用户使用。我认为 Orchard 是最好的，因为它拥有所有这些中最好的反馈。 Umbraco 更多地针对那些想要调整很多东西的开发者。
果园 - https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1978360/anybody-using-orchard-cms
链接 - 开源 ASP.NET MVC CMS 的评论/比较
I'd pass on Umbraco and C1 Composite, as they generally aren't user-friendly. I think Orchard is best, as it has the best feedback of them all. Umbraco is aimed more at developers who want to tweak a lot of things.
Orchard - https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1978360/anybody-using-orchard-cms
Link - Reviews/Comparison of Open Source ASP.NET MVC CMS
Umbraco 将是一个非常好的选择，因为它：
Umbraco would be a very good choice because it:
如果您想脱离 .NET 和 IIS，Joomla 是 LAMP 中另一个流行的 CMS。它可以托管在 Unix 或 Win 环境中。有一个庞大的社区、大量的实现和强大的插件 API。我在 Mac 上的 MAMP 上运行它，并且它也在 WAMPServer 上运行以进行开发。
去年，我使用 Mighty Extensions 在 Joomla 中创建了一个会员风格的网站，提供住宿加早餐列表服务 (http://uurehome.com)。强大的用户和会员资格就足够了，这添加了自定义用户字段和订阅计划。您必须为 Mighty Extensions 付费。 B&B 清单的付款是通过 Paypal 完成的，Mighty 会员资格可以实现这一点。
Mighty Membership 的订阅计划功能非常好。您可以有时间长度、续订费用、续订唠叨消息。本来可以自己写，但为什么要付出这样的代价:-)
Joomla 当然可以处理非营利网站的社区方面，有常见的内容、讨论、新闻提要等等。凡人管理也可以。
不太确定与果园相比，因为我还没有在果园上踢过轮胎。我过去以做企业网络CMS为生，所以我习惯评估这类产品。根据我在文档中看到的屏幕截图，Orchard 的工作方式看起来与 Joomla 类似。我可以自信地说的一件事是，在 Joomla（或 LAMP/WAMP/MAMP 之类的东西）上运行比在 MS Webmatrix 上运行更容易。但是，如果您已经有 Webmatrix 提供商，那么它是类似的。一位做过大量 IIS 和几乎所有 Web 技术的人说，这些技术可以追溯到时间之初（即 1993 年）。
在这个针对小型企业的项目中，我使用 Joomla 的另一个方面是，如果我停止帮助她，该所有者可以使用许多 Joomla 知识渊博的网页设计商店。虽然我并不是说没有一个从事网页设计的人在做 Orchard，但我的感觉是它比 Joomla 小得多。这是我帮助非营利组织、教堂等的一个因素，而不是让他们处于“唯一”可以维持其运行的人的境地。不过，如果当地有几家网页设计店在做 Orchard，我想说这就足够让人感到舒服了。
If you will go outside of .NET and IIS, Joomla is another popular CMS in LAMP. This can be hosted in either Unix or Win environments. There's a large community, lots of implementations and robust API for plugins. I run it on MAMP on my Mac, and it also runs on WAMPServer, for development.
Last year I created a membership style site in Joomla using Mighty Extensions for a bed and breakfast listing service (http://uurehome.com). Mighty User and Membership was enough, this adds custom user fields and subscription plans. You do have to pay for Mighty Extensions. Payment for the B&B listings is done thru Paypal, Mighty Membership enables this.
The subscription plan feature is Mighty Membership is very good. You can have length of time, cost renewals, renewal nag messages. Could have written myself, but why at this cost :-)
Joomla can certainly handle the community side of a non-profit site, there's the usual assortment of content, discussions, news feeds and so on. It's also ok for mere mortals to administer.
Not so sure about comparing to Orchard, as I haven't kicked the tires on Orchard. I have done enterprise web CMS for a living in the past, so I am used to evaluating these sorts of products. Orchard looks similar to Joomla in how it works, based on the screenshots I see in the docs. One thing I will say with confidence is that it's easier to standup Joomla (or something LAMP/WAMP/MAMP) than on the MS Webmatrix. However, if you already have a Webmatrix provider, then it's similar. Said by someone that has done a bunch of IIS and pretty much all the web technologies going back to the beginning of time (that's 1993).
Another aspect of using Joomla for me in this project, which is for a small business, was knowing that there's a bunch of Joomla knowledgable web design shops this owner could use if I stop helping her. While I am not going to say there isn't a base of folks doing web design that are doing Orchard, my sense is that its much smaller than Joomla. This is a factor for me in helping non-profits, churches and so on, not leaving them in a place where I am the "only" person that could keep whatever it is running. Still, if there's even a couple of local web design shops that do Orchard, I'd say that's enough to feel comfortable.
我们在 Orchard 上构建了 http://aclj.org，并在其中实现了自定义会员资格，以支持数百万会员。我们通过 Kimbia 处理捐款和请愿书签名的表格。我们对实施感到非常满意，并认为 Orchard 作为一个平台对我们来说效果很好。它具有很强的可扩展性，我们内部开发了 32 个自定义模块。
We built http://aclj.org on Orchard with a custom membership implementation within to support millions of members. We do form processing through Kimbia for donations and petition signatures. We're very happy with the implementation and feel that Orchard worked out well for us as a platform. It is VERY extensible and we developed 32 custom modules in-house.
对于非营利组织来说，不太可能维护昂贵的服务器，而 LAMP 堆栈既有低成本服务器，又有一些像样的 CMS 可以完美满足您的要求。其中一些是：
其中任何一个都具有高度可扩展性，得到了强大的社区支持，大量的主题和模块随时可用，您可以免费获得很棒的东西虽然也有一些是一次性付费的。
如果您想要我的推荐，我会选择 Drupal，因为它提供：
希望为您的搜索增添新的维度:)
祝您好运
For a non profit organization it is unlikely to maintain a costly server where LAMP stack has both low cost server and some decent CMS which meets your requirements perfectly. Some of them are :
Any of them are highly extensible, got a great community support , plenty of themes and modules readily available and you can get awesome things for free though there are some paid once too.
And if you want my recommendation i would go for Drupal as it provides :
Hope that adds a new dimension to your search :)
Best of luck
我会推荐 WordPress 以满足您的要求。
优点：
1.更多论坛支持。
2、简单易学。
3. 托管网站的服务器成本非常低。
4.你将拥有N个插件和小部件等...
希望它能带来一些意义:)
I would recommend wordpress for your requirement.
Advantages:
1. More forum support.
2. Easy to learn.
3. Very less server cost to host the site.
4. You will have N number of plugins and widgets etc...
Hope It gives some sense :)