Compatibility is not a problem if your intention is to use the engine only in mobile browsers/wrappers (or modern desktop browsers). Moreover, the performance is essential for web-based mobile applications.
So you have a couple of options:
jQuery templates
Pros: more or less well documented, widely used.
Cons: it is no longer being maintained by jQuery team, ie forever beta.
Clousure templates:
Pros: rich construction blocks - ifs, foreach, etc. Can compile the same template for multiple targets (js, java ...)
Cons: you'll have to execute the compiler to compile the template even on development stage, that is, client side compilation is not available. For me, it's a pain. Although it's very powerful, seems like "a bazooka to kill a mosquito" if used only for web.
distal
Never used, but it seems more like a "dynamic UI engine" like knockout or angularjs than a template engine.
mustache (I pick this one).
It has a very simple (yet powerful) syntax - you can learn mustache in 15 minutes - and by not providing "complex blocks" it enforces you to create good models instead of fat and complex templates, with a bunch of ifs, whiles and foreachs.
There are engine versions for more than 10 languages, including javascript, .net, java, ruby...
Cons: The simplicity in a few cases becomes limiting
mustache + hogan
Hogan is a compiler for the Mustache templating language written by the guys from twitter.
It is really fast
It can compile templates at runtime or pre-compile for packaging tools.
I used jQuery templates for a large-scale jQuery Mobile single page app on ASP.NET MVC 3. Putting all the template files in a partial view worked quite well. Templates worked well on all browsers that jQuery Mobile supported including IE 6,7,8.
发布评论
评论（4）
如果您只想在移动浏览器/包装器（或现代桌面浏览器）中使用该引擎，那么兼容性不是问题。此外，性能对于基于网络的移动应用程序至关重要。
所以你有几个选择：
小胡子： http://mustache.github.com/mustache.5.html
霍根： https://github.com/twitter/hogan.js
Compatibility is not a problem if your intention is to use the engine only in mobile browsers/wrappers (or modern desktop browsers). Moreover, the performance is essential for web-based mobile applications.
So you have a couple of options:
mustache: http://mustache.github.com/mustache.5.html
hogan: https://github.com/twitter/hogan.js
我使用 Distal 模板，它适用于 iPhone。
I use Distal templates and it works on the iPhone.
我在 ASP.NET MVC 3 上的大型 jQuery Mobile 单页应用程序中使用了 jQuery 模板。将所有模板文件放在局部视图中效果非常好。模板在 jQuery Mobile 支持的所有浏览器上运行良好，包括 IE 6、7、8。
https://github.com/jquery/jquery-tmpl
I used jQuery templates for a large-scale jQuery Mobile single page app on ASP.NET MVC 3. Putting all the template files in a partial view worked quite well. Templates worked well on all browsers that jQuery Mobile supported including IE 6,7,8.
https://github.com/jquery/jquery-tmpl
应用程序如何“大”？如果您主要是在模板之后，则应尝试Google闭合模板尝试 -
http://code.google.com /closure/templates/
一些概念 -
http://code.google .com/CLOSURE/模板/doc/concepts.html
How "big" is the application? If you are primarily after templates you should give Google Closure Templates a try -
http://code.google.com/closure/templates/
Some concepts -
http://code.google.com/closure/templates/docs/concepts.html