“复制”带有“REPLACING”的语句在COBOL中
我收到编译错误,因为
在嵌套的“COPY”中找到了带有“REPLACING”短语的“COPY”语句。
这是我们的编译设置,我们不能在嵌套副本中使用 REPLACING 动词。 我们有一本抄写本,其中有多个带有替换动词的复制语句。 谁能帮我解决这个错误?
I am getting compilation error as,
A "COPY" statement with "REPLACING" phrase was found within a nested "COPY".
This is our compilation setting that we can not use REPLACING verb in nested copy.
We have one copybook which is having multiple copy statements with replacing verb.
Can anyone help me to resolve this error?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(2)
在 COBOL 中嵌套 COPYBOOKS 是有一点技巧的。一般来说
仅当不存在时才可以嵌套习字簿
包含
REPLACING
短语并且不会导致递归。假设您有以下两个字帖:
COPYBOOK ABC
和
COBPYOOK XYZ
不允许在 COPYBOOK ABC 中嵌套,因为它包含
REPLACING
短语。但是,您可以执行以下操作。从 COPYBOOK ABC 中删除
RELACING
这样它变成:
COPYBOOK ABC
现在将 COPYBOOK ABC 包含到源程序中,如下所示:
REPLACE
指令会导致所有出现:A:
被
B
替换,直到遇到REPLACE OFF
指令,并且这些替换发生在所有 COPY 指令执行后。网
上述语句的结果将是:
这是执行嵌套抄写本替换的唯一“合法”方式
据我所知,在 COBOL 中。
Nesting COPYBOOKS in COBOL is a bit of a trick. In general
you may nest copybooks only if they do not
contain the
REPLACING
phrase and do not cause recursion.Suppose you had the following two copybooks:
COPYBOOK ABC
and
COBPYOOK XYZ
The nesting in COPYBOOK ABC is not allowed because it contains a
REPLACING
phrase.However, you can do the following. Drop
RELACING
from COPYBOOK ABC soit becomes:
COPYBOOK ABC
Now include COPYBOOK ABC into your source program as follows:
The
REPLACE
directive causes all occurances of:A:
tobe replaced by
B
until aREPLACE OFF
directive is encountered, and thesereplacements occur after all
COPY
directives have been actioned. The netresult of the above statements would be:
This is the only 'legal' way of performing replacements to nested copybooks
in COBOL that I am aware of.
虽然 Neal 的答案对于他和 OP 正在使用的 Cobol 变体来说可能是正确的,但值得注意的是,一些 Cobol 编译器将允许嵌套 COPY ... REPLACING 语句。
事实上,我们有很多在代码中使用它的实例。
例如,我有许多 Cobol 模块程序,其中包含以下方式的复制成员:
并且“uwxxxxsel.prg”复制成员包含另一个文件的以下
COPY
,如下所示:并且效果很好。
我将其用作通用功能的一种“继承”结构。
不过,我们的编译器有一个问题。更高级别的
REPLACING
在嵌套的REPLACING
之后不会继续,但是只要嵌套的REPLACING
是copymember中的最后一个东西,它就是美好的。While Neal's answer may be correct for the Cobol variant he and the OP are using, it is worth noting that some Cobol compilers will allow nested
COPY ... REPLACING
statements.Indeed we have many instances where we use this in our code.
For example, I have many Cobol module programs that include a copymember in the following way:
and the 'uwxxxxsel.prg' copymember contains the following
COPY
of another file as follows:and this works fine.
I use this as a kind of 'inheritance' structure for common functionality.
There is one gotcha, though, with our Compiler. The higher level
REPLACING
does not continue after the nestedREPLACING
, but as long as the nestedREPLACING
is the last thing in the copymember, it is fine.