虽然有些人肯定会争论,但自己推出确实是一种选择。前提是您可以发布可使用的架构和语法或 API 库。鉴于您仔细研究了当前的标准格局并借鉴了已建立的(尽管不合适)实施,您(和支持者)可能倾向于制定新的或扩展的标准;也许可以解决一个未解决的问题。
但是,强制性的:
While some will certainly argue, rolling your own is certainly an option; provided you can release a consumable schema and syntax or API library. Given that you carefully research the current standards landscape and borrow from established (albeit unfitting) implementations, you (and supporters) could be inclined to produce a new or extended standard; perhaps one that solves an unsolved problem.
发布评论
评论(5)
虽然有些人肯定会争论,但自己推出确实是一种选择。前提是您可以发布可使用的架构和语法或 API 库。鉴于您仔细研究了当前的标准格局并借鉴了已建立的(尽管不合适)实施,您(和支持者)可能倾向于制定新的或扩展的标准;也许可以解决一个未解决的问题。
但是,强制性的:
While some will certainly argue, rolling your own is certainly an option; provided you can release a consumable schema and syntax or API library. Given that you carefully research the current standards landscape and borrow from established (albeit unfitting) implementations, you (and supporters) could be inclined to produce a new or extended standard; perhaps one that solves an unsolved problem.
However, obligatory:
经过一些研究后发现,目前还没有 OData 的良好替代方案。
我是根据Odata的特点这么说的。希望我们能在某个时候看到替代方案。
After some research it appears that no, there is not really a good alternative to OData at this point.
I'm saying this based on the features of Odata. Hopefully we'll see an alternative at some point.
Facebook 正在开发 GraphQL。可以使用JSON查询来查询数据:
目前不可用。根据变更日志,他们计划将其作为一种规范发布。
这里是另一份白皮书
Facebook is developing GraphQL. Data can be queried using JSON queries:
At the moment it is not usable. According to the Changelog they plan to release it as a kind of specification.
Here is another whitepaper
Google 正在推动 GData,但该功能似乎已被削弱。
Google is pushing for GData, which seems feature crippled.
如果您正在寻找符合网络标准的搜索机制,我建议您查看开放搜索
If you are looking for a web compliant search mechanism, I suggest looking at Open Search