openid不是让事情变得更困难了吗？
我正在考虑为我的国际网站使用 openid。所以我正在阅读有关提供商和 openid 的内容，也许我只是不明白。我明白他们声称的好处，但当我看到它在其他网站上使用时，它似乎并没有让事情变得更简单，实际上更复杂。
如果我访问 livejournal.com 或其他网站并想要登录，我会列出大约 10 个组织可供登录。我有 google/yahoo/facebook/twitter...所以我选择 facebook，听起来很简单。好的，我在接受网站后登录。现在我去另一个网站，他们不提供 facebook，只提供 google 和 yahoo，所以我选择 yahoo...然后另一个网站他们不提供 yahoo，只提供 google，很快我就不得不记住我访问的网站我没有使用过哪些提供商？因为如果我在网站上更改为使用不同的提供商，是否会在该网站上创建一个新帐户？我显然不明白这里的一些事情，有人可以帮忙吗？
I was thinking about using openid for my international site. So I was reading about providers and openid and perhaps I just don't get it. I see what they claim are the benefits, but when I see it in use on other sites, it doesn't seem to make things simpler but actually more complicated.
If I go to livejournal.com or whatever and I want to sign in, I have a list of like 10 organizations to sign in from. I have google/yahoo/facebook/twitter... so I choose facebook, sounds easy enough. Ok I'm signed in after accepting the website. Now I go to another site, they don't offer facebook, only google and yahoo, so I choose yahoo... then another site they don't offer yahoo, only google, pretty soon I end up having to memorize which sites I used which providers don't I? because if I change to use a different provider on a site won't that be creating a new account on the site? I'm obviously not understanding something here, can someone please help?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（1）
任何有价值的 OpenID 系统都可以让您输入自己的 URL。因此，即使某些网站的提供商列表中未提供 Facebook，您也只需输入 Facebook OpenID 端点 URL，就可以使用 Facebook 进行身份验证。
Any OpenID system worth a salt lets you type in your own URL. So even if Facebook isn't offered in the provider listing on some site, you just need to type in the Facebook OpenID endpoint URL, and you'll be able to authenticate using Facebook.