这段代码如何抛出 ActiveRecord::ReadOnlyRecord 异常?

发布于 2024-12-03 04:03:49 字数 2898 浏览 0 评论 0原文

我有一个购买模型,其中has_one优惠券

Purchase 模型包含以下代码:

def decrement_coupon
  coupon = Coupon.find_by_code(coupon_code, :readonly => false)
  return unless coupon.respond_to?(:uses)
  coupon.uses = coupon.uses - 1
  coupon.save
end

但前几天我收到此错误:

ActiveRecord::ReadOnlyRecord - ActiveRecord::ReadOnlyRecord:
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/persistence.rb:245:in `create_or_update'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/callbacks.rb:273:in `create_or_update'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activesupport-3.0.6/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:419:in `_run_save_callbacks'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/callbacks.rb:273:in `create_or_update'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/persistence.rb:39:in `save'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/validations.rb:43:in `save'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/attribute_methods/dirty.rb:21:in `save'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:240:in `save'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:292:in `with_transaction_returning_status'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/database_statements.rb:139:in `transaction'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:207:in `transaction'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:290:in `with_transaction_returning_status'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:240:in `save'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:251:in `rollback_active_record_state!'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:239:in `save'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/associations/association_proxy.rb:222:in `send'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/associations/association_proxy.rb:222:in `method_missing'
 /var/www/88tactical_production/releases/20110823232510/app/models/purchase.rb:69:in `decrement_coupon'

Does :readonly => false 不保证非只读记录?将此功能移至优惠券模型会有所不同吗? (无论如何我可能都会这样做)

I have a Purchase model which has_one Coupon.

The Purchase model contains this code:

def decrement_coupon
  coupon = Coupon.find_by_code(coupon_code, :readonly => false)
  return unless coupon.respond_to?(:uses)
  coupon.uses = coupon.uses - 1
  coupon.save
end

But I got this error the other day:

ActiveRecord::ReadOnlyRecord - ActiveRecord::ReadOnlyRecord:
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/persistence.rb:245:in `create_or_update'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/callbacks.rb:273:in `create_or_update'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activesupport-3.0.6/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:419:in `_run_save_callbacks'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/callbacks.rb:273:in `create_or_update'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/persistence.rb:39:in `save'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/validations.rb:43:in `save'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/attribute_methods/dirty.rb:21:in `save'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:240:in `save'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:292:in `with_transaction_returning_status'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/database_statements.rb:139:in `transaction'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:207:in `transaction'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:290:in `with_transaction_returning_status'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:240:in `save'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:251:in `rollback_active_record_state!'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:239:in `save'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/associations/association_proxy.rb:222:in `send'
 /usr/local/rvm/gems/ree-1.8.7-2010.02@lyconic/gems/activerecord-3.0.6/lib/active_record/associations/association_proxy.rb:222:in `method_missing'
 /var/www/88tactical_production/releases/20110823232510/app/models/purchase.rb:69:in `decrement_coupon'

Does :readonly => false not guarantee a non-readonly record? Would moving this function to the Coupon model make a difference? (I'll probably do that regardless)

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(1

复古式 2024-12-10 04:03:49

这可能是由于通过 find_by_code() 帮助程序加入了其他子值。

当 ActiveRecord 使用联接来查找返回其他值的对象时,它会将记录标记为只读。

这里有关于这个问题的完整描述:

是什么导致了此 ActiveRecord::ReadOnlyRecord 错误?

如果是这种情况,您可以通过将 :joins 转换为填充ActiveRecord 实例无需将其标记为只读。

This is probably due to joining in other child values through your find_by_code() helper.

When ActiveRecord uses joins to lookup an object returning additional values, it marks the record read-only.

There's a thorough description of this on this question here:

What is causing this ActiveRecord::ReadOnlyRecord error?

If this is the case, you can probably fix the issue by turning a your :joins into a proper :include that populates the ActiveRecord instances without marking them read-only.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文