MinGW 够稳定吗
MinGW（Windows 上的 gcc 端口）是否足够稳定，可以编译包含各种数据算法（无 DirectX，无图形，...）的 DLL 以进行 24/7 生产？ 我们需要做出决定，出于多种原因我们不想使用 Visual C++。
所以问题是：“当前的 MinGW 是否足够稳定以用于生产？”
Is MinGW (gcc port on Windows) stable enough for compiling a DLL consisting of various data algorithms (no DirectX, no graphics, ...) for 24/7 production?
We need to make a decision and from many reasons we do not want to use Visual C++.
So question is: "Is current MinGW stable enough for production?"
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（2）
它已经有好几年了（看起来有 13 年了），并且得到了积极维护。它有一个分支策略，有一个稳定分支和一个开发分支。我认为这对于生产来说足够稳定:)
不过，许可对您来说可能是一个问题。如果你不向任何人付款，你就没有合同支持，并且如果存在导致你赔钱的错误，则无法起诉（不过，在你相信我之前，请先检查许可证）。
我遇到的唯一问题是有关 autotools 支持的文档，但我对 autotools 还很陌生，那是 7 年前的事了，当时我正在尝试制作一个 DLL，可以用作 Visual Studio 项目的直接替代品。 YMMV。
It is several years old (13 years it seems), and actively maintained. It has a branching strategy that has a stable branch and a development branch. I'd call that stable enough for production :)
Licensing might be an issue for you, though. If you don't pay anyone, you have no contractual support, and can't sue if there is a bug that causes you to lose money (check the license before you trust me on that, though).
The only problems I had with it were with documentation on autotools support, but I was new to autotools, that was 7 years ago, and I was trying to make a DLL that could be used as a drop-in replacement to a Visual Studio project. YMMV.
是的，MinGW 对于生产代码来说绝对是稳定可靠的。
Yes, MinGW is most definitely stable and reliable for production code.