仅在第二项上使用 ord），因此您可能需要再次检查。如果，正如您现在所表明的那样，您在每个术语上都使用 ord ，那么这对我来说效果很好。
它们都从 97 + 98 + 99 返回 294，即 a、b 和 的 ASCII 值>c。
And what happens when you use:
echo ord('a')+ord('b')+ord('c');
which is probably what you intended in that second one :-)
In other words, you appear to have left the ord of the final part of the expression.
In fact, the only way you would normally get 98 would be with:
echo ('a')+ord('b')+('c')
(with ord only on the second term) so you may want to check again. If, as you seem to now indicate, you're using ord on each term, that works fine for me.
Both of them return 294 from 97 + 98 + 99, the ASCII values for a, b and c.
发布评论
评论（1）
当你使用时会发生什么：
这可能就是你在第二个中的意图:-)
换句话说，你似乎已经离开了最后部分的
ord的表达。事实上，通常获得
98的唯一方法是：（仅在第二项上使用
ord），因此您可能需要再次检查。如果，正如您现在所表明的那样，您在每个术语上都使用ord，那么这对我来说效果很好。它们都从
97 + 98 + 99返回294，即a、b和的 ASCII 值>c。And what happens when you use:
which is probably what you intended in that second one :-)
In other words, you appear to have left the
ordof the final part of the expression.In fact, the only way you would normally get
98would be with:(with
ordonly on the second term) so you may want to check again. If, as you seem to now indicate, you're usingordon each term, that works fine for me.Both of them return
294from97 + 98 + 99, the ASCII values fora,bandc.