I doubt you'll have much success in getting objective answers with empirical evidence on this here. The PhoneGap community (although growing) is already a small subset of the mobile development community. I doubt many have start-to-finish implemented actual performance tests of these stacks and compared them:
I'd try looking around for comparisons of the various JS frameworks themselves for any notable performance differences and start testing the PhoneGap implementations yourself to see if the PhoneGap wrap affects the performance of each beyond the margins of difference between the individual frameworks. Or perhaps you could consult directly with the PhoneGap documentation and/or dev team yourself as I imagine they've had to test on various platforms and frameworks already.
发布评论
评论（2）
我怀疑您在这里能否通过经验证据获得客观答案。 PhoneGap 社区（尽管不断增长）已经是移动开发社区的一小部分。我怀疑很多人已经从头到尾实现了这些堆栈的实际性能测试，并对它们进行了比较：
与
等。
我会尝试四处比较各种 JS 框架本身是否有任何显着的性能差异，并开始自己测试 PhoneGap 实现看看 PhoneGap 包装对每个框架的性能的影响是否超出了各个框架之间的差异范围。或者，也许您可以直接咨询 PhoneGap 文档和/或开发团队，因为我想他们已经必须在各种平台和框架上进行测试了。
只是一个建议。
I doubt you'll have much success in getting objective answers with empirical evidence on this here. The PhoneGap community (although growing) is already a small subset of the mobile development community. I doubt many have start-to-finish implemented actual performance tests of these stacks and compared them:
vs
etc.
I'd try looking around for comparisons of the various JS frameworks themselves for any notable performance differences and start testing the PhoneGap implementations yourself to see if the PhoneGap wrap affects the performance of each beyond the margins of difference between the individual frameworks. Or perhaps you could consult directly with the PhoneGap documentation and/or dev team yourself as I imagine they've had to test on various platforms and frameworks already.
Just a suggestion.
请查看以下内容。作者实际上确实花了时间在不同的 JS 框架中重新做了他的应用程序。
Have a look at the following. The author actually did spend the time re-doing his application in different JS frameworks.