我应该为自定义 CMS 使用什么富文本编辑器
我想构建一个自定义 CMS，其中用户富文本编辑器是创建内容而不是 wiki 标记的主要方式。
除了稳定性和性能之外，我希望RTE能够轻松可扩展。后一点非常重要，因为我打算将其扩展到我的需要。
例如，我希望用户能够将 OpenSocial 小工具和白板（基于画布）嵌入到页面中。我还希望用户嵌入媒体源，例如（youtube、slideshare 等）。
我初步调查显示，Dojo（dijit）的RTE和TinyMCE都相当不错。您如何比较两者的稳定性、性能和可扩展性？我还应该考虑其他符合要求的 RTE 吗？
PS：我使用dojo作为主要的js库。
I want to build a custom CMS where users a Rich text editor is the main way to create content rather than wiki markup.
Besides stability and performance, I want the RTE to be easily extensible. The latter point is very important because I intend to extend it to my needs.
For example I want the users to be able to embed OpenSocial gadgets and whiteboard (based on canvas) into the page. I also the want the users to embed media source like (youtube, slideshare etc).
My preliminary investigation shows that Dojo's (dijit) RTE and TinyMCE are pretty good. How would you compare the two in terms of stability, performance and extensibility. Any other RTE's I should be looking at that fit the bill?
PS: I am using dojo as the main js library.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（1）
看看这里（包含一些非常有用的信息的博客文章）。
我自己的观点是，有两个免费的可用 rtes 相比之下彼此接近。它们是 CKEditor 和 Tinymce。我的经验是在tinymce方面，我可以说使用自己的插件的可扩展性非常好。一些独立测试表明，tinymce 似乎比 CKEditor 更先进，其他人则声称 CKEditor 更好。您必须自行决定（开发每天都在进一步推进，并且自这些测试以来已经开发了新功能）。
您还可以在这里查看比较和讨论：
Hava a look here (blog post with some very helpfull informations).
My own opinion is that there are two free available rtes that are close to each other in comparison. Those are CKEditor and Tinymce. My experience lies on the tinymce side and i can say that the extensibility using own plugins is great with it. Some independent tests have shown that tinymce seems to be more adavanced than CKEditor, others claim CKEditor is better. You will have to decide on your own (development is advancing further each day and new functionality has been developed since those tests).
You may also have a look here for comparisons and discussions: