2011 doxygen 还是只是 javadoc？
之前有人问过 Doxygen 与 Javadoc，但那是 2011 年了，我想对此有一些新的看法。请分享您的经验。我需要它来处理大型 api，有很多领域需要发布或不发布，具体取决于许多因素。在某些课程中，我想发布其他课程较少的所有内容，因此我需要对此进行精细控制。无论如何，我也想要 doxygen 的整体比较和最近的经验。谢谢
Doxygen vs. Javadoc has been asked before but its 2011 and I wanted some new opinions on this. Please share your experiences. I need it for large api with lots of areas to publish or not publish depending on many factors. Some class I want to publish everything others less so I need granular control over this. Anyway I also want overall comparison and recent experience with doxygen. Thanks
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（1）
JavaDoc，历史上 doxygen 用于语言没有像样的文档工具的情况，例如 C++。
另外，我不确定使用 doxygen 是否可以获得 Maven 的本机支持。
它还归结为您的目标用户群体，他们是否会更习惯 doxygen 或 javadoc 风格和语法？
JavaDoc, historically doxygen is used in situations where a language does not have a decent doc facility, e.g. C++.
Also, I'm not sure if going doxygen, you get native support for Maven.
It also boils down to your targeted user demographic, are they going to be more ascustomised with doxygen or javadoc style and grammar?