由于 BLOB 存储尚不支持平滑流式传输，并且由于 SMarx 的应用程序有一些限制，并且可能会随着未来流式传输协议的更改而中断，因此我希望以虚拟机角色托管 IIS 媒体服务，并从 Blob 存储中提取视频位。我的想法是让 VM 实例包含一个网站，其内容是从表达式 4 输出的。网站目录的内容使用 CloudBerry 等工具与新的 blob 条目/删除一起提供（保持同步）。这是一个彻底的拼凑吗？
since BLOB storage does not yet support smooth streaming, and since SMarx's application has some limitations and may possibly break with future streaming protocol changes, I would like to host IIS Media Services in a Virtual Machine role and pull the video bits from blob storage. My idea as of this second revolves around having the VM instance contain a web site whose contents is output from Expression 4. The contents of the website directory is provided (kept in sync) with new blob entries/deletes using something like CloudBerry. Is this a complete and utter kludge?
发布评论
评论（1）
我想到的一个想法是 - 为什么选择 VM 角色？我最近写了一篇关于将 Windows 功能安装到辅助角色中的博文 - 同样的想法也适用于将媒体服务安装到 Web 角色 + IIS 中。否则，我认为这没有理由行不通。显然，始终运行至少 2 个实例的警告适用...
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/golive/archive/2011/08/15/installing-windows-features-in-a-windows-azure-role-instance.aspx
One thought that comes to mind is - why VM Role? I recently wrote a blog post about installing Windows Features into a worker role - the same ideas would apply to installing media services into a web role + IIS. Otherwise, I see no reason why this would not work. Obviously the admonition to always run at least 2 instances applies...
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/golive/archive/2011/08/15/installing-windows-features-in-a-windows-azure-role-instance.aspx