在 Postgres SQL 中选择正聚合值并忽略负聚合值
我必须应用某种转换fn(argument)
。这里的argument
等于value
,但当它为负数时则不然。当您获得第一个负值
时,您将“等待”,直到它与连续值相加并且该总和变为正数。然后你执行fn(argument)
。请参阅我想要获得的表格:
value argument --------------------- 2 2 3 3 -10 0 4 0 3 0 10 7 1 1
我可以对所有值求和并将 fn
应用到总和,但是 fn
对于不同的行可能不同,因此必须了解行号来选择具体的fn。
由于想要一个 Postgres SQL 解决方案,看起来窗口函数适合,但我还没有足够的经验来编写执行此操作的表达式。事实上,不幸的是,我对“用sql思考”很陌生。我想这可以通过命令式方式轻松完成,但我还不想编写存储过程。
I must apply a certain transformation fn(argument)
. Here argument
is equal to value
, but not when it is negative. When you get a first negative value
, then you "wait" until it sums up with consecutive values and this sum becomes positive. Then you do fn(argument)
. See the table I want to get:
value argument --------------------- 2 2 3 3 -10 0 4 0 3 0 10 7 1 1
I could have summed all values and apply fn
to the sum, but fn
can be different for different rows and it is essential to know the row number to choose a concrete fn.
As want a Postgres SQL solution, looks like window functions fit, but I am not experienced enough to write expression that does that yet. In fact, I am new to "thinking in sql", unfortunately. I guess that can be easily done in an imperative way, but I do not want to write a stored procedure yet.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(2)
我想我迟到了,但这可能对某人有帮助:
I suppose I'm late, but this may help someone:
这并不真正适合任何预定义的聚合函数。您可能需要自己编写。请注意,在 postgresql 中,聚合函数可以用作窗口函数,事实上,从 9.0 开始,这是用 C 以外的任何语言编写窗口函数的唯一方法。
您可以编写一个函数来跟踪“求和”值的状态,但如果当前“和”为正,它总是返回输入值,而当“和”为负时,它只继续添加。然后您只需取该总和或零中的较大者即可。简而言之:
您需要创建一个聚合函数来调用此累加器:
这定义了聚合将整数作为输入并将其状态存储为整数。
我将您的示例复制到表中:
现在您可以通过使用带有窗口子句的聚合函数来生成这些值:
因此,如您所见,最后一步是您需要获取函数的输出(如果它是正数) ,或零。这可以通过包装查询或编写一个函数来完成:
现在:
这会生成您在问题中指定的函数的参数。
This doesn't really fit any of the predefined aggregation functions. You probably need to write your own. Note that in postgresql, aggregate functions can be used as window functions, and in fact that is the only way to write window functions in anything other than C, as of 9.0.
You can write a function that tracks the state of "summing" the values, except that it always returns the input value if the current "sum" is positive, and just keeps adding when the "sum" is negative. Then you simply need to take the greater of either this sum or zero. To whit:
You need to create an aggregate function to invoke this accumulator:
This defines that the aggregate takes integers as input and stores its state as an integer.
I copied your example into a table:
And you can now have those values produced by using the aggregate function with a window clause:
So as you can see, the final step is that you need to take the output of the function if it is positive, or zero. This can be done by wrapping the query, or writing a function to do that:
and now:
This produces the arguments for the function that you specified in the question.